2007
DOI: 10.1080/10447310709336952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Use, In Situ: Extending Field Research Methods

Abstract: Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author's name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pagination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conclude that researchers following our simple protocols have a much greater chance of uncovering results which more accurately represent small device usage in natural real world settings. We do not claim that our protocols are the finishing point of this type of experimental design [39], but the starting point [40]. We do not believe that our work will answer all questions related to controlled experimentation in naturalistic settings but that an informative framework will emerge based on the number of end user studies performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conclude that researchers following our simple protocols have a much greater chance of uncovering results which more accurately represent small device usage in natural real world settings. We do not claim that our protocols are the finishing point of this type of experimental design [39], but the starting point [40]. We do not believe that our work will answer all questions related to controlled experimentation in naturalistic settings but that an informative framework will emerge based on the number of end user studies performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, some academics have studied how different elements of context influence the user experience (Jumisko-Pyykkö & Vainio, 2012). Moreover, it has been demonstrated that evaluation methods such as the "think aloud" protocol need to be adapted and new methods that suit the challenges to evaluate technology in the field should be developed (Fields et al, 2007). Living lab researchers mention field tests as an approach to discover and understand how technology is appropriated in a real-life setting (Ballon et al, 2005;Følstad, 2008;Kjeldskov & Skov, 2014;.…”
Section: Lynn Coorevits Annabel Georges and Dimitri Schuurmanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, some academics have studied how different elements of context influence the user experience (Jumisko-Pyykkö & Vainio, 2012). Moreover, it has been demonstrated that evaluation methods such as the "think aloud" protocol need to be adapted and new methods that suit the challenges to evaluate technology in the field should be developed (Fields et al, 2007). Living lab researchers mention field tests as an approach to discover and understand how technology is appropriated in a real-life setting (Ballon et al, 2005;Følstad, 2008;Kjeldskov & Skov, 2014;Veeckman et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%