2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2006.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-train air quality assessment of the railway transit system in Beijing: A note

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 presents the PM 10 and PM 2.5 levels inside the metro trains for different metro systems worldwide. It is worth noting here that PM 10 and PM 2.5 levels inside the metro trains in the Taipei metro system are lower than those measured in London (Adams et al, 2001;Seaton et al, 2005), Berlin (Fromme et al, 1998), Beijing (Li et al, 2006;Li et al, 2007) and Seoul (Kim et al, 2008;Park and Ha, 2008), and similar to those measured in Helsinki (Aarnio et al, 2005;Asmi et al, 2009) and Los Angeles (Kam et al, 2011). However, PM 10 and PM 2.5 levels measured inside the metro trains in these metro systems vary widely according to monitoring conditions such as the time, place, or season of the measurements, the measurement equipment used, and the outdoor climate (Kim et al, 2008).…”
Section: Comparison Of Pm 10 and Pm 25 Levels Inside Metro Trains Unmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 3 presents the PM 10 and PM 2.5 levels inside the metro trains for different metro systems worldwide. It is worth noting here that PM 10 and PM 2.5 levels inside the metro trains in the Taipei metro system are lower than those measured in London (Adams et al, 2001;Seaton et al, 2005), Berlin (Fromme et al, 1998), Beijing (Li et al, 2006;Li et al, 2007) and Seoul (Kim et al, 2008;Park and Ha, 2008), and similar to those measured in Helsinki (Aarnio et al, 2005;Asmi et al, 2009) and Los Angeles (Kam et al, 2011). However, PM 10 and PM 2.5 levels measured inside the metro trains in these metro systems vary widely according to monitoring conditions such as the time, place, or season of the measurements, the measurement equipment used, and the outdoor climate (Kim et al, 2008).…”
Section: Comparison Of Pm 10 and Pm 25 Levels Inside Metro Trains Unmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Chan et al (2002a) noted that the PM 2.5 -to-PM 10 ratios inside the trains were approximately 0.72 in the Hong Kong mass transit railway system. Li et al (2007) presented that PM 2.5 -to-PM 10 ratios inside the trains were approximately 0.34 in above-ground environments in the Beijing railway transit system. A study of the Seoul subway system by Park and Ha (2008) demonstrated PM 2.5 -to-PM 10 ratios of 0.87 and 0.80 inside trains in ground-level environments and underground environments, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison Of Particle Mass Size Distributions and Pm 25 -Tmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies have been made to monitor the in-train PM2.5 levels in the Beijing subway system (Li et al, 2006(Li et al, , 2007. However, observations of PM concentrations alone may not be sensitive enough to characterize the intrinsic nature of the iron-containing particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tel. : +886-2-29089899; Fax: +886-2-29084513 E-mail address: yhcheng@mail.mcut.edu.tw subway systems, such as those in London (Pfeifer et al, 1999;Sitzmann et al, 1999;Adams et al, 2001;Seaton et al, 2005), Stockholm (Johansson and Johansson, 2003), Prague (Braniš, 2006), Rome (Ripanucci et al, 2006), Berlin (Fromme et al, 1998), Seoul (Kim et al, 2008;Park and Ha, 2008) and Beijing (Li et al, 2007). Moreover, Karlsson et al (2005) compared the ability of particles from a subway station and a nearby very busy urban street, respectively, to damage DNA and to induce oxidative stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%