1992
DOI: 10.1177/007327539203000102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“In the Warehouse”: Privacy, Property and Priority in the Early Royal Society

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since other artisans were involved in the scientific debates of the time, from the inimitable Robert Hooke to the lens maker Nicolaas Hartsoeker, the focus on writing and publication can serve to show the common problems they faced, as well as the local specificities. 123 This article has sought to enrich the current literature on the relations between artisans and scholars, which foregrounds the role of trading zones and state-sponsored expertise. Most prominently, it signals the instrumental role of writing and publishing in the course of an artisanal career in the seventeenth century, and hence the importance of the literary field as a useful framework for studying the role of artisans in the Scientific Revolution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since other artisans were involved in the scientific debates of the time, from the inimitable Robert Hooke to the lens maker Nicolaas Hartsoeker, the focus on writing and publication can serve to show the common problems they faced, as well as the local specificities. 123 This article has sought to enrich the current literature on the relations between artisans and scholars, which foregrounds the role of trading zones and state-sponsored expertise. Most prominently, it signals the instrumental role of writing and publishing in the course of an artisanal career in the seventeenth century, and hence the importance of the literary field as a useful framework for studying the role of artisans in the Scientific Revolution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 As we shall see, this is exactly what happened in the case of Poincaré, as scientists, philosophers and historians of science successively entered the fray to establish "who really did what".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…18 Profi ting from collaboration yet keen to assert priority, depicting his instrument without divulging its essential design, Richard Towneley's representations of his telescopic micrometer register the tectonic pressures impinging upon authorship at the intersections of art, science and technology in the early Enlightenment. 19 In his case, Towneley's bet-hedging precautions were entirely justifi ed. Already pre-empted by Auzout, Towneley found a new claimant upon his micrometer in the person of Robert Hooke (then Curator of Experiments to the Royal Society) who closely shadowed the instrument's development.…”
Section: Picture Object: the Backstorymentioning
confidence: 99%