2003
DOI: 10.1111/1475-4762.00105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘In the shadow of hierarchy’: meta‐governance, policy reform and urban regeneration in the West Midlands

Abstract: This paper explores the relationship between political hierarchy and the complex webs of political organization associated with urban governance. Deploying the concept of metagovernance and a study of urban policy reform in the West Midlands region of England, this paper claims that state and governmental hierarchies continue to have a crucial role in coordinating the activities of governance regimes in the UK. This paper concludes by considering the effects of hierarchical power on the systems of political pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
119
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
119
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of the new, less formal, networks operating at the local and regional scales is thus constrained by more established forms of decisionmaking. We might agree with those analysts who describe the 'meta-governance' through which governmental hierarchies continue to coordinate complex local and regional governance (for example Whitehead, 2003) and Allmendinger and Haughton's view of the 'meta governance' of central management of local decisions (Allmendinger and Haughton, 2008). But central government does more than orchestrate the regional and local scales.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The influence of the new, less formal, networks operating at the local and regional scales is thus constrained by more established forms of decisionmaking. We might agree with those analysts who describe the 'meta-governance' through which governmental hierarchies continue to coordinate complex local and regional governance (for example Whitehead, 2003) and Allmendinger and Haughton's view of the 'meta governance' of central management of local decisions (Allmendinger and Haughton, 2008). But central government does more than orchestrate the regional and local scales.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The state acts as a third party to the cooperation, using mandates and regulatory instruments to resolve conflicts and mediate actions among the government organizations at subnational levels. In this situation, the cooperation may be operated by "state hegemony" [39] or in the shadow of hierarchy [40]. Vertical meta-governance usually happens at the initial stage of cooperation building (e.g., the state pulling in necessary organizations to raise perceived interdependence).…”
Section: Vertical Meta-governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such relations are changing, and there is an extensive literature adopting a 'network' perspective, which emphasises a more open, flexible and negotiating approach to modern public governance. Still, it is highly disputed if such network relations are in fact allowing more discretion to the local level in the vertical relation, or if central rule prevails and network governance is conducted 'in the shadow of hierarchy' (Whitehead, 2003;Scharpf, 1994, see also Sharpe, 1985. Also for the vertical dimension one is likely to find a mix where some elements will always be determined by central government, while others will not, or less so.…”
Section: Market Hierarchy and Network In The Bus Transport Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%