2022
DOI: 10.1177/00220574221102329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In the Room, but no Seat at the Table: Mixed Methods Analysis of HBCU Women Faculty and Workplace Bullying

Abstract: With gendered organization theory and n = 201 Historically Black Colleges and Universities women faculty, the following is addressed: RQ1 Which Historically Black Colleges and University women faculty, those at schools with or without an anti-bullying policy, are more likely to report workplace bullying? RQ2 What is the relationship between workplace bullying intensity and time spent strategizing against bullying, health problems, and organizational distrust for Historically Black Colleges and University women… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, scholarly culture valorizes debate and adversarial argumentation as an instrument of intellectual rigor (Belcher, 1997;Moulton, 1983). In a culture that encourages academics to don a thick skin and be prepared to withstand fierce criticism, targets are disincentivized from speaking up for fear of being labeled as overly sensitive, unintellectual, or unable to defend their position (Hollis, 2022;Keashly, 2021). By requiring faculty to embrace confrontation as part of how they perform their occupational identity and job role, this culture of critique helps to render inequality "unspeakable" (Gill, 2014) in the academic workplace and in turn unmanageable by administrators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, scholarly culture valorizes debate and adversarial argumentation as an instrument of intellectual rigor (Belcher, 1997;Moulton, 1983). In a culture that encourages academics to don a thick skin and be prepared to withstand fierce criticism, targets are disincentivized from speaking up for fear of being labeled as overly sensitive, unintellectual, or unable to defend their position (Hollis, 2022;Keashly, 2021). By requiring faculty to embrace confrontation as part of how they perform their occupational identity and job role, this culture of critique helps to render inequality "unspeakable" (Gill, 2014) in the academic workplace and in turn unmanageable by administrators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Added to this barrier are those linked to intersectionality. In effect, the migratory status of women is presented as a factor when advancing in their academic careers (Sang et al, 2013;Hollis, 2022). Similarly, the current economy of prestige that governs universities is presented as an indisputable barrier to women's careers (Kandiko Howson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Thematic Category 2: Difficulties In Academic Careersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While workplace bullying generally involves all races and genders, it is particularly pertinacious for those from underrepresented populations in academia. 'Research has shown that people of color and women experience bullying to a far greater degree than their white and male counterparts, and bullying occurs more often in higher education than in other workplaces' [15]. One article estimates that rates of bullying in academia range between 25% and 91% [16].…”
Section: Minorities Bullying and Academiamentioning
confidence: 99%