2021
DOI: 10.1159/000514016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In the Mood for a Blood Donation? Pilot Study about Momentary Mood, Satisfaction, and Return Behavior in Deferred First-Time Donors

Abstract: <b><i>Introduction:</i></b> To maintain a sufficient donor pool, deferred first-time donors (FTD) should be motivated to return for blood donation. This pilot study investigates how deferral affects momentary mood, satisfaction with the donation process, and subsequent return behavior to examine their potential for motivating (deferred) FTD. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> All of the subjects (<i>n</i> = 96) completed a first questionnaire (A1) before pre-dona… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two examples for additional categories not listed in the meta-analysis of Bednall and Bove (2011) are "physical consequences (positive and negative physical effects)" and "mental well-being (positive and negative psychological effects)", which came as no surprise, since previous research has frequently reported the (expected) physical and mental impact of blood donation [35][36][37][38]. Notably, studies investigating the potential positive influence of blood donation on well-being are comparatively a more recent development [39][40][41]. The chosen approach in this study is a valuable step towards the harmonization of nomenclatures and hence better comparability of data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two examples for additional categories not listed in the meta-analysis of Bednall and Bove (2011) are "physical consequences (positive and negative physical effects)" and "mental well-being (positive and negative psychological effects)", which came as no surprise, since previous research has frequently reported the (expected) physical and mental impact of blood donation [35][36][37][38]. Notably, studies investigating the potential positive influence of blood donation on well-being are comparatively a more recent development [39][40][41]. The chosen approach in this study is a valuable step towards the harmonization of nomenclatures and hence better comparability of data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Donors may be deemed temporarily ineligible to donate for a variety of reasons, both for the protection of the donor's health and for the protection of future recipients. 1,2 Being told they are ineligible to donate can have a negative emotional impact on the donor [3][4][5] and reduce the likelihood of the donor returning to donate at the end of the deferral period. [6][7][8] A potential reason for nonreturn is that donors mistakenly view the deferral as permanent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 While these results highlight the practical and financial impact of ineligibility for organizations recruiting stool donors, they do not consider the donor's perspective regarding their temporary or permanent ineligibility to donate or associated costs. Blood donor research suggests that some who are ineligible to donate may experience negative emotions (e.g., anger, anxiety, sadness) 9 or low mood 10 from being deferred. Gemelli and colleagues 9 used a modified version of the Discrete Emotions Questionnaire to understand blood donors' state-based emotional responses to deferral and factor-analyzed responses to form six composite emotion factors-disgust, happiness, sadness, calm, anxiety, and anger.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%