2018
DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In the Beginning: The Role of Myth in Relating Religion, Brain Science, and Mental Well‐being

Abstract: Building upon the insights of scholars attuned to story, narrative, and myth, this article explores the relationship between myth, science, and religion. After clarifying the interplay of the three terms—story, narrative, and myth—and the preference for the term myth, this article will argue that myth can serve as a medium through which religion, neuroscience, and mental well‐being interact. Such an exploration will cover the role of myths in religion, the neurological basis of myth, and the practices of narra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I think my own research (see Wright 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020) has perhaps been most aligned with the idea of science‐and‐religion scholars becoming “historians of the present.” I am particularly interested in science‐and‐religion as it is engaged within popular literature. Studying the lives of characters has led me to think about what I call science‐and‐religion‐as‐lived (see Wright 2019)—not only within the lives of fictional characters but also those within our nonfiction, extra‐textual world.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…I think my own research (see Wright 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020) has perhaps been most aligned with the idea of science‐and‐religion scholars becoming “historians of the present.” I am particularly interested in science‐and‐religion as it is engaged within popular literature. Studying the lives of characters has led me to think about what I call science‐and‐religion‐as‐lived (see Wright 2019)—not only within the lives of fictional characters but also those within our nonfiction, extra‐textual world.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%