2021
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.202000276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In soil measurement of radiation dose caused by X‐ray computed tomography

Abstract: Radiation damage to plants through X‐ray exposure has been reported to impair root growth. The literature on the critical dose for growth impairment is inconclusive, partly as dose measurements in soil are scarce. Here we fill this gap and show that the dose in a typical single pot scan amounts to 1.2 Gy. In addition, we demonstrate the shortcomings of estimating the dose from scan settings using the RadPro Calculator and highlight the efficient reduction of X‐ray exposure by a lead shield.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…to the plant shoot and in the soil outside the field of view. With this setup, the dose per scan measured with a radiophotoluminescence dosimeter in the centre of the column amounts to 1.2 Gy (Lippold et al 2021). The obtained images were reconstructed into a 3D tomogram having voxel side length of 45 μm and an 8-bit greyscale via a filtered back projection algorithm with the CT Pro 3D software (Nikon metrology).…”
Section: Mycorrhizal Colonizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to the plant shoot and in the soil outside the field of view. With this setup, the dose per scan measured with a radiophotoluminescence dosimeter in the centre of the column amounts to 1.2 Gy (Lippold et al 2021). The obtained images were reconstructed into a 3D tomogram having voxel side length of 45 μm and an 8-bit greyscale via a filtered back projection algorithm with the CT Pro 3D software (Nikon metrology).…”
Section: Mycorrhizal Colonizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To follow root development, X-ray CT scanning was performed at days 7, 14, and 21 after planting during the night not to interfere with plant photosynthesis in the same way as described by Lippold et al A lead shield was also placed between the X-ray source and the soil column to shield the plant shoot and the soil outside the field of view. With this setup, the dose per scan in the center of the column amounts to 1.2 Gy . The obtained whole-column images with a resolution of 45 μm were used during sampling to allow for a targeted sampling of specific root types and root ages (Figure a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this setup, the dose per scan in the center of the column amounts to 1.2 Gy. 33 The obtained whole-column images with a resolution of 45 μm 16 were used during sampling to allow for a targeted sampling of specific root types and root ages (Figure 1a). In this study, a sample was selected that featured a primary root that was at least 14 days old and that included several laterals of the same age.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such sequential imaging, however, can potentially attenuate root growth by radiation-induced damage from the deposited energy or dose. In fact, a number of investigations have focused speci cally on characterizing the radiation dose delivered to roots during XCT analyses for various setups, especially for benchtop, medical, or industrial systems 1,3,6,7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input parameters for the calculator of voltage, current, distance between source and sample, and lter material and thickness apply more to benchtop, industrial, or medical XCT systems and less to synchrotron-based XCT that has become widely used in rhizosphere related investigations [9][10][11][12] . Later, Lippold et al 7 also showed that the Rad Pro Calculator substantially underestimated the radiation dose measured directly using dosimeters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%