2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.11.241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ X-ray diffraction study of molecular-beam epitaxial growth of InAs/GaAs(0 0 1) quantum dots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Epitaxial growth techniques have been used to overcome these limitations using a variety of deposition techniques (atomic laser deposition, pulsed laser deposition, sputtering, chemical vapor deposition, molecular beam epitaxy) to sequentially deposit the constituents, but this approach typically requires a lattice match between the constituent compounds. Even with epitaxial growth techniques, it is frequently difficult to find growth conditions that enable the preparation of both components because of conflicting demands on growth conditions resulting from the high vapor pressure of some elements (such as chalcogenides) and the need for high surface temperatures to obtain sufficient surface mobilities of other elements (such as third-row transition metals). The lack of suitable growth conditions, suitable latticed matched substrates, or lattice match between the components precludes the growth of many potential materials. , One exception to the lattice match requirement is the van der Waals epitaxy approach pioneered by Koma for compounds containing van der Waals gaps in their structures, such as the dichalcogenides, but such intergrowths are often limited by the conflicting demands on growth conditions stated above. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Epitaxial growth techniques have been used to overcome these limitations using a variety of deposition techniques (atomic laser deposition, pulsed laser deposition, sputtering, chemical vapor deposition, molecular beam epitaxy) to sequentially deposit the constituents, but this approach typically requires a lattice match between the constituent compounds. Even with epitaxial growth techniques, it is frequently difficult to find growth conditions that enable the preparation of both components because of conflicting demands on growth conditions resulting from the high vapor pressure of some elements (such as chalcogenides) and the need for high surface temperatures to obtain sufficient surface mobilities of other elements (such as third-row transition metals). The lack of suitable growth conditions, suitable latticed matched substrates, or lattice match between the components precludes the growth of many potential materials. , One exception to the lattice match requirement is the van der Waals epitaxy approach pioneered by Koma for compounds containing van der Waals gaps in their structures, such as the dichalcogenides, but such intergrowths are often limited by the conflicting demands on growth conditions stated above. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of suitable growth conditions, suitable latticed matched substrates, or lattice match between the components precludes the growth of many potential materials. 17,18 One exception to the lattice match requirement is the van der Waals epitaxy approach pioneered by Koma for compounds containing van der Waals gaps in their structures, such as the dichalcogenides, but such intergrowths are often limited by the conflicting demands on growth conditions stated above. [19][20][21][22] In this paper, we show that it is possible to prepare the first 16 members of the {[(VSe 2 ) n ] 1.06 (TaSe 2 ) m } z (m, n ) 1-4) family using modulated elemental reactants, a technique that involves sequentially depositing elements in the appropriate atomic ratios and absolute thicknesses on an ambient temperature substrate followed by a low-temperature anneal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical composition in the dots was analyzed by utilizing X-ray anomalous scattering [13][14][15][16][17] and the structure factor of zinc-blende type crystals [8]. More recently, in-situ X-ray diffraction measurements have been carried out during InAs/GaAs(001) quantum dot growth [18,19]. These X-ray techniques are promising to reveal structural properties including internal strains and chemical compositions, which cannot be determined by conventional techniques including electron diffraction and scanning-probe microscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] One of the advantages of XRD as an in situ tool is its wide application range as a consequence of the weak interaction of X-rays with matter. Crystal growth takes place at the surface of a crystal in contact with a mother phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%