2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ X-ray diffraction studies of lithium–sulfur batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
198
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
28
198
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analogous to our study, the formation of large crystalline sulfur domains at the cathode/separator interface upon charging of a discharged sulfur electrode was also observed by Cañas et al, 38 albeit with different shapes/morphology. We believe that the accumulation of sulfur at the cathode/separator interface during the last stages of the charging process is most likely due to the oxidation of dissolved polysulfides (solubilities of 0.1 to 1 mol/l in the electrolyte) contained inside the separator (rather than inside the cathode) during the final stages of charging: under this condition, the high cathode potential will cause the rapid and highly localized oxidation of polysulfides which are stored inside the separator region once they reach the cathode/separator interface, thereby forming a deposit at this very interface.…”
Section: Activation Of LI 2 S In Lisupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analogous to our study, the formation of large crystalline sulfur domains at the cathode/separator interface upon charging of a discharged sulfur electrode was also observed by Cañas et al, 38 albeit with different shapes/morphology. We believe that the accumulation of sulfur at the cathode/separator interface during the last stages of the charging process is most likely due to the oxidation of dissolved polysulfides (solubilities of 0.1 to 1 mol/l in the electrolyte) contained inside the separator (rather than inside the cathode) during the final stages of charging: under this condition, the high cathode potential will cause the rapid and highly localized oxidation of polysulfides which are stored inside the separator region once they reach the cathode/separator interface, thereby forming a deposit at this very interface.…”
Section: Activation Of LI 2 S In Lisupporting
confidence: 90%
“…5b). This may be compared to the study by Cañas et al, 38 who observed the disappearance of Li 2 S diffractions during the charge of a discharged S cathode at already ≈50% of the charging capacity, which is most likely due to the much smaller Li 2 S particles formed during S [a] SEM image of the middle separator (out of three layers) of a Li/Li 2 S half-cell after initial charging at 1 C as shown by the red curve in Fig. 3a. [b] EDS mapping of carbon, oxygen, and sulfur of a lithium dendrite feature in the separator, whereby the high oxygen signal at the location of the dendrite originates from lithium which was deliberately exposed to air in order to oxidize it.…”
Section: Activation Of LI 2 S In Limentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The cathode electrolytes consisted of 10 µL of sulfolane containing 10 mM of the relevant POM and 1 M LiTFSI, as sulfolane allowed stable operation at high temperatures due to its high boiling point (>280°C) while ether-based liquid electrolytes would not. 6,12,[21][22][23][24][25] Hence, each cell contained 0.1 µmol of POM and approximately 28 µmol of sulfur atoms. A standard electrolyte that did not contain POM was also used as a control sample.…”
Section: Cell Preparation With Protective Anodementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second section of the discharge curves is the low voltage region (Q low ), comprised of a well-defined plateau where less soluble Li 2 S 2 and Li 2 S are produced (theoretically, Q low = 1256 mAh g ¹1 ). [21][22][23][24][25] Analyzing the discharge curves focusing on the capacities in high and low voltage regions provides further insights into the effects of SiW on the sulfur redox chemistry at the cathode. For the cell containing SiW, Q high and Q low were 420 mAh g ¹1 and 860 mAh g ¹1 , respectively (Fig.…”
Section: ¹1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent years, many review articles are available in the literature describing the working principles, advantages, and limitations of lithium/sulfur batteries (Ji and Nazar, 2010;Barghamadi et al, 2013;Bresser et al, 2013;Manthiram et al, 2013;Nazar and Evers, 2013). Also, numerous articles appear on the fundamental chemistry Zhang, 2013a), performance of modified cathode materials (Ji et al, 2009;Liang et al, 2009;Yang et al, 2011;Fu et al, 2012), their fading mechanism (Diao et al, 2013), AFM, and Raman characterizations (Aurbach et al, 2009;Elazari et al, 2010;Yeon et al, 2012;Hagen et al, 2013) in situ XRD (Canas et al, 2013a) and impedance analysis (Yuan et al, 2009;Canas et al, 2013b). The preparation and characterization of cathode and anode materials for Li-S batteries are beyond the scope of this article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%