2015
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ X-ray diffraction and the evolution of polarization during the growth of ferroelectric superlattices

Abstract: In epitaxially strained ferroelectric thin films and superlattices, the ferroelectric transition temperature can lie above the growth temperature. Ferroelectric polarization and domains should then evolve during the growth of a sample, and electrostatic boundary conditions may play an important role. In this work, ferroelectric domains, surface termination, average lattice parameter and bilayer thickness are simultaneously monitored using in situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction during the growth of BaTiO3/SrTiO3… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, uncompensated bound surface charges at epitaxial ferroelectric interfaces result in a depolarizing field, which can trigger a drop of the ferroelectric Curie temperature (T c ) or nanoscale domain splitting [13][14][15][16][17]. Furthermore, ferroelectric layers are usually grown below T c [18][19][20][21], so that their polarization state is set during the heterostructure growth [22][23][24]. Here the deposition process and the accompanying transient electrostatic effects at the metal-ferroelectric interface govern the resulting polarization state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, uncompensated bound surface charges at epitaxial ferroelectric interfaces result in a depolarizing field, which can trigger a drop of the ferroelectric Curie temperature (T c ) or nanoscale domain splitting [13][14][15][16][17]. Furthermore, ferroelectric layers are usually grown below T c [18][19][20][21], so that their polarization state is set during the heterostructure growth [22][23][24]. Here the deposition process and the accompanying transient electrostatic effects at the metal-ferroelectric interface govern the resulting polarization state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X-rays have the potential to overcome these challenges owing to their highly penetrating nature and sensitivity to nanometrescale features. Observation of subsurface structures in real time during film growth appears to be even more challenging, and has rarely been attempted 7 . Bulk signals are sometimes observed as unwanted background in grazing-incidence surface X-ray scattering experiments, but there have been few attempts to quantitatively understand the features responsible for such signals 8,9 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While tremendous advances have been made in understanding ferroelectrics on their own, fundamental aspects of their behavior in the ultrathin regime or once inserted in multilayers or superlattice architectures are still under intense investigation [19][20][21]. The buildup of a ferroelectric polarization P in a material is accompanied by the accumulation of bound charges at its surfaces.…”
Section: Ferroelectric Thin Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This depolarizing field D depends on the thickness of the ferroelectric layer and its electrostatic environment, such as the presence of metallic electrodes or the surrounding gas partial pressure and their respective charge screening efficiencies [22][23][24]. The role of the depolarizing field becomes critical in ultrathin ferroelectric single layers and in superlattices, where interface effects may become predominant [19,21,25,26]. As illustrated in Figure 1, a small change in film thickness and charge environment will have a drastic influence on the manifestation of a ferroelectric state and its domain configuration.…”
Section: Ferroelectric Thin Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%