2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ work function measurements of W, WO3 nanostructured surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, not all materials exhibit the formation of nanocones under He ion irradiation. Ti [19][20][21][22], beryllium [23], copper [24] and stainless steel [20,21] exhibited nanocones on their surfaces after irradiation, whereas tungsten (W) never exhibited cone structures formed on its surface [25][26][27][28][29]. It is suspected that the sputtering yield [30] and the shear modulus [31] of the materials may have a considerable influence on the evolution of the surface morphology, especially in cone development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, not all materials exhibit the formation of nanocones under He ion irradiation. Ti [19][20][21][22], beryllium [23], copper [24] and stainless steel [20,21] exhibited nanocones on their surfaces after irradiation, whereas tungsten (W) never exhibited cone structures formed on its surface [25][26][27][28][29]. It is suspected that the sputtering yield [30] and the shear modulus [31] of the materials may have a considerable influence on the evolution of the surface morphology, especially in cone development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%