2012
DOI: 10.2514/1.c031727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Velocity Measurements in the Near-Wake of a Ship Superstructure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14. For headwind, the flow moving over the top of the hangar already has residual turbulence from being in the wake of the pilot house and explains the reason why our turbulence intensities show very little variation with elevation above the flight deck (Brownell et al 2012). We do not observe a significant increase in hy 0 y 0 i 1/2 /U ref and hw 0 w 0 i 1/2 /U ref turbulence intensities downstream of the reattachment point, as observed by Tinney and Ukeiley (2009).…”
Section: B Flow On the Flight Deck Behind Hangar Superstructuresupporting
confidence: 53%
“…14. For headwind, the flow moving over the top of the hangar already has residual turbulence from being in the wake of the pilot house and explains the reason why our turbulence intensities show very little variation with elevation above the flight deck (Brownell et al 2012). We do not observe a significant increase in hy 0 y 0 i 1/2 /U ref and hw 0 w 0 i 1/2 /U ref turbulence intensities downstream of the reattachment point, as observed by Tinney and Ukeiley (2009).…”
Section: B Flow On the Flight Deck Behind Hangar Superstructuresupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The purpose of this experiment is to validate the previous wind tunnel results. Onboard measurements are rarely found among the literature, with studies such as Snyder et al 6,7 and Brownwell et al 31 being some of the few examples. In Figure 9, a photograph taken during the onboard measurement acquisition is displayed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A description of the facility and data for a direct headwind has been discussed previously. 5 For ship airwake flows, flow topology is known to change drastically with sometimes slight changes in incident wind direction. 4 This necessitates full-field validation data from a number of wind directions, to assess the ability of a simulation to capture changes in flow structure and the particular inflow conditions under which those changes occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%