2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00340-010-4324-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ third-order interferometric autocorrelation of a femtosecond deep-ultraviolet pulse

Abstract: In-situ third-order interferometric autocorrelation of a femtosecond deep-ultraviolet pulse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For TH 1 signals [ Fig. 3(a)], assuming Gaussian pulse shape, the fitting yields an ∼36 fs incident pulse width that matches the FP duration [20]. In practice, THG at the glass-air interface is an efficient method to diagnose fs pulses [8,9] independent of laser wavelength and requiring much less stringent phase matching as compared to second-order nonlinear pulse characterization methods [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For TH 1 signals [ Fig. 3(a)], assuming Gaussian pulse shape, the fitting yields an ∼36 fs incident pulse width that matches the FP duration [20]. In practice, THG at the glass-air interface is an efficient method to diagnose fs pulses [8,9] independent of laser wavelength and requiring much less stringent phase matching as compared to second-order nonlinear pulse characterization methods [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%