XV International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components. eBook of Proceedings 2020
DOI: 10.23967/dbmc.2020.190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Situ Tests on Silica Aerogel-Based Rendering Walls

Abstract: In this paper, two aerogel-based renders are characterized based on in-situ testing of walls prototypes. The in-situ tests to assess the mechanical performance are: pull-off, surface impact tests and compressive strength on collected samples. The physical performance includes the water resistance and thermal conductivity coefficient. The tests carried out to assess water-resistance are: Karsten tube, moisture meter and capillary water absorption of collected samples. The thermal performance was tested based on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the low adhesive strength, which is expected in these types of thermal mortars, cohesive fractures in the render itself were observed, which were within the admitted values in ETAG 004 [ 64 ] (for a thermal multi-layered system with boards insulating materials) and the results obtained by Maia et al [ 66 ] for thermal rendering systems. As discussed by Flores-Colen et al [ 67 ], because of the low weight of aerogel cement-based renders and their vulnerability to thermal variation, the low adhesive strength could be admitted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the low adhesive strength, which is expected in these types of thermal mortars, cohesive fractures in the render itself were observed, which were within the admitted values in ETAG 004 [ 64 ] (for a thermal multi-layered system with boards insulating materials) and the results obtained by Maia et al [ 66 ] for thermal rendering systems. As discussed by Flores-Colen et al [ 67 ], because of the low weight of aerogel cement-based renders and their vulnerability to thermal variation, the low adhesive strength could be admitted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the low adhesive strength, which is expected in these types of thermal mortars, cohesive fractures in the render itself were observed, which were within the admitted values in ETAG 004 [64] (for a thermal multilayered system with boards insulating materials) and the results obtained by Maia et al [66] for thermal rendering systems. As discussed by Flores-Colen et al [67], because of the low weight of aerogel cement-based renders and their vulnerability to thermal variation, the low adhesive strength could be admitted. In terms of impact resistance, higher cracking of the coating and dent diameter after the EN and ETAG aging methods were observed (see Figure 8), where the water action contributed to increasing the deterioration; however, these values should be carefully analyzed since the measurement procedure (in millimeters) presented some variation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, Sakiyama et al [4] exposed large-scale wall prototypes of trial mixtures of ACM to severe weathering cycles in the laboratory at which the walls insulated by ACM showed signs of excessive water intrusion after the weathering cycles. In [9][10][11][12][13][14][15], the Acap of trial mixtures of ACMs was declared in based a single round of measurement, i.e., one wetting and drying cycle, as specified in EN ISO 1015-18 [16]. The declared values in [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] ranged from 0.48 and 2.8 kg/(m 2 •min 0.5 ), which are all higher than the stated requirement for thermal insulation coating mortars of less than 0.4 kg/(m 2 •min 0.5 ) [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9][10][11][12][13][14][15], the Acap of trial mixtures of ACMs was declared in based a single round of measurement, i.e., one wetting and drying cycle, as specified in EN ISO 1015-18 [16]. The declared values in [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] ranged from 0.48 and 2.8 kg/(m 2 •min 0.5 ), which are all higher than the stated requirement for thermal insulation coating mortars of less than 0.4 kg/(m 2 •min 0.5 ) [17]. The literature review highlights that studies on the Acap of ACMs are limited to a few studies that focus on trial mixtures with scattered results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the studies on ACMs, [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ] reported results on A cap for different trial mixtures of ACMs. Here, pre-conditioned samples were measured only once, and their properties were declared after the first wetting cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%