2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0956-053x(99)00329-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ TCE bioremediation study using electrokinetic cometabolite injection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even with initial TCE concentrations increased from 10 to 20, 30, 40, and 50 mg L -1 , the TCE concentrations were significantly decreased to 1.2, 0.4, 1.2, . This result confirms that the iron-iron oxide mixture exhibits higher capacity for TCE decomposition than previously developed TCE decomposing methods referred in [2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Decomposition Of Tcesupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even with initial TCE concentrations increased from 10 to 20, 30, 40, and 50 mg L -1 , the TCE concentrations were significantly decreased to 1.2, 0.4, 1.2, . This result confirms that the iron-iron oxide mixture exhibits higher capacity for TCE decomposition than previously developed TCE decomposing methods referred in [2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Decomposition Of Tcesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Therefore, to satisfy the severe environmental regulations for TCE concentration, several detoxification methods have been developed using activated charcoal filter or microbes; however, they are not sufficient solutions due to several disadvantages. For example, the TCE collection rate using a charcoal filter decreased after long-term use [2,3], and decomposition of TCE by bioremediation requires long periods for purification [4,5]. Therefore, methods for TCE detoxification with high efficiency and without undesirable effects on the environment have yet to be developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to other degradation techniques, which may suffer from many disadvantages as, for example, the conversion to more toxic compounds, slow degradation rates (e.g., k ¼ 0.01-0.1 day À1 for microbial techniques (Rabbi et al, 2000;Rodriguez et al, 2004) and k ¼ 0.01-0.1 h À1 for zerovalent iron (Johnson et al, 1996)), our approach converted effectively and rapidly (k ¼ 0.0685 AE 0.0011 min À1 ) TCE to ethane. A bio-Pd based MR technology demonstrated its potential for the removal of TCE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioremediation coupled with EK-PR could increase the temperature, bioavailability and transformation of organic contaminants without causing extreme pH conditions at the electrodes [20,21]. In addition, this technique may enhance the microbial activity for the degradation of contaminants, by producing oxygen at the anode [22]. In EK-Bio technology, the removal of organic contaminant likely depends not only on the effect of biodegradation, but also on that of electrical intensity induced stimulation [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%