2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ stress measurements and regional stress field assessment of the Beishan area, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is obvious to see that the boreholes NRG01 and NRG02 show quite better rock mass quality than the boreholes TMS01 and TMS02, while the borehole NRG01 shows better quality than the average condition of the nine boreholes from the Beishan area. According to Figure 8, RQD measured for borehole NRG01 shows the best quality, and most of the RQD values are higher than 90%, although some poor cases are observed at the depths around 300 m and 540 m. For the boreholes TMS01 and TMS02, the rock quality is very poor in the shallower depth, and it becomes better with the increase of depth; however, it is still not good enough at the depth of 400~600 m. For borehole NRG02, rock mass quality in the shallower depth is better than the cases in TMS01 and TMS02, but it becomes very poor at the depth of 400~600 m. Figure 9 shows the RQD measurements in the boreholes drilled in Beishan (BS) area [4], and it can be found that the boreholes BS05 and BS06 show the best rock mass qualities. In the Alxa area, only borehole NRG01 shows comparable RQD values with these two boreholes in the Beishan area.…”
Section: Rqd Analyses From Drilling Coresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is obvious to see that the boreholes NRG01 and NRG02 show quite better rock mass quality than the boreholes TMS01 and TMS02, while the borehole NRG01 shows better quality than the average condition of the nine boreholes from the Beishan area. According to Figure 8, RQD measured for borehole NRG01 shows the best quality, and most of the RQD values are higher than 90%, although some poor cases are observed at the depths around 300 m and 540 m. For the boreholes TMS01 and TMS02, the rock quality is very poor in the shallower depth, and it becomes better with the increase of depth; however, it is still not good enough at the depth of 400~600 m. For borehole NRG02, rock mass quality in the shallower depth is better than the cases in TMS01 and TMS02, but it becomes very poor at the depth of 400~600 m. Figure 9 shows the RQD measurements in the boreholes drilled in Beishan (BS) area [4], and it can be found that the boreholes BS05 and BS06 show the best rock mass qualities. In the Alxa area, only borehole NRG01 shows comparable RQD values with these two boreholes in the Beishan area.…”
Section: Rqd Analyses From Drilling Coresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed comparison on the proportion of different rock mass qualities based on the boreholes of TMS01, TMS02, NRG01, NRG02, as well as the nine boreholes from Beishan area [4] is presented in Table 1 and Figure 10. It is obvious to see that the boreholes NRG01 and NRG02 show quite better rock mass quality than the boreholes TMS01 and TMS02, while the borehole NRG01 shows better quality than the average condition of the nine boreholes from the Beishan area.…”
Section: Rqd Analyses From Drilling Coresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations