1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6028(97)00811-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ STM study of the initial stages of corrosion of Cu(100) electrodes in sulfuric and hydrochloric acid solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

21
124
1
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
21
124
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported for chlorine adlayers under UHV conditions [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] as well as in chloride-containing electrolytes. 6,7,[26][27][28][29][30][31] However, at the electrochemical interface the c͑2 ϫ 2͒ structure was observed only positive of a critical potential ͑−0.4 V Ag/AgCl at a Cl concentration of 10 −3 M͒ by in situ STM, whereas at more negative potentials the ͑1 ϫ 1͒ substrate lattice was visible, suggesting a potential-induced order-disorder phase transition into a dilute adlayer of highly mobile chloride. 28,30 More recently, the surface-normal interface structure of the c͑2 ϫ 2͒ adlayers of Cl and Br on Cu͑001͒ was studied by in situ SXRD, focusing on the halide-copper interlayer spacing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It has been reported for chlorine adlayers under UHV conditions [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] as well as in chloride-containing electrolytes. 6,7,[26][27][28][29][30][31] However, at the electrochemical interface the c͑2 ϫ 2͒ structure was observed only positive of a critical potential ͑−0.4 V Ag/AgCl at a Cl concentration of 10 −3 M͒ by in situ STM, whereas at more negative potentials the ͑1 ϫ 1͒ substrate lattice was visible, suggesting a potential-induced order-disorder phase transition into a dilute adlayer of highly mobile chloride. 28,30 More recently, the surface-normal interface structure of the c͑2 ϫ 2͒ adlayers of Cl and Br on Cu͑001͒ was studied by in situ SXRD, focusing on the halide-copper interlayer spacing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We have focused on the potential range in which the Cu surface is covered by the well-known c(22) chloride adsorbate layer, [16][17][18] where the adsorbate motion was sufficiently low to be observed directly. After describing our method of preparing Cu(100) electrodes with the required, low S ad coverage and demonstrating that the dynamic behavior of these adsorbates is not significantly altered by the STM measurement, we describe the tracer diffusion of isolated S ad in the undistorted c (22) adlayer and the influence of the S ad ÀS ad interactions on the adsorbate dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the effect of the potential f in the second case, we consider the adatom formation energy, which has a potential-dependent electrostatic contribution of p Z e 0 À1 C d f, where C d is the differential capacitance and p Z the dipole moment of the metal adatom. [14] Using p Z = 0.092 e , calculated for Cu adatoms on bare Cu(100) [15] and C d = 25 mC cm À2 , [16] this energy contribution is 0.26 eV V À1 . The corresponding change in the Cu ad surface concentration for a potential increase Df is exp (p Z e 0 À1 C d Df/ k B T), which would result in a 125 % increase for Df = 80 mV at room temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%