2020
DOI: 10.3390/ma13081848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Situ SEM Observation on Fracture Behavior of Titanium Alloys with Different Slow-Diffusing β Stabilizing Elements

Abstract: The fracture-behaviors of two Ti-Al-Sn-Zr-Mo-Nb-W-Si alloys with different slow-diffusing β stabilizing elements (Mo, W) were investigated through in-situ tensile testing at 650 • C via scanning electron microscopy. These alloys have two phases: the α phase with hcp-structure (a = 0.295 nm, c = 0.468 nm) and the β phase with bcc-structure (a = 0.332 nm). Three-dimensional atom probe (3DAP) results show that Mo and W mainly dissolve in the β phase, and they tend to cluster near the α/β phase boundary. Adding mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the pore fraction rate of the TMF 54P/M alloy was measured to be 1.4% higher because the Mo content of TMF 54P/M was increased more than that of TMF 34P/M. In addition, it is known that the low diffusivity of Mo interferes with the movement of the particle boundary and affects grain refinement [33]. Figure 5 shows the pore analysis table observed in the P/M alloys.…”
Section: Microstructural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the pore fraction rate of the TMF 54P/M alloy was measured to be 1.4% higher because the Mo content of TMF 54P/M was increased more than that of TMF 34P/M. In addition, it is known that the low diffusivity of Mo interferes with the movement of the particle boundary and affects grain refinement [33]. Figure 5 shows the pore analysis table observed in the P/M alloys.…”
Section: Microstructural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the pore fraction rate of the TMF 54P/M alloy was measured to be 1.4% higher because the Mo content of TMF 54P/M was increased more than that of TMF 34P/M. In addition, it is known that the low diffusivity of Mo interferes with the movement of the particle boundary and affects grain refinement [33]. According to the IPF map in Figure 6, schematized by measuring the misorientation of the TMF design alloy, the size of the prior β grain decreased from 226.55 μm to 211.99 μm when the Mo content increased from the actual TMF 34 P/M to TMF 54 P/M.…”
Section: Microstructural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The service temperature of the existing common high-temperature titanium alloy is only 600 ℃. In order to ensure the high-temperature performance, the aluminum equivalent ([Al]eq) of the common high-temperature titanium alloy design has reached the limit [5], such as IMI834 [6], Ti-1100 [7], Ti60 [8], Ti600 [9]. Therefore, it is meaningless to continue increasing the content of α stabilizing element and the neutral element in the design of titanium alloy used at higher temperature, and the content of β stabilizing element should be adjusted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%