2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-016-1125-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ roots decompose faster than shoots left on the soil surface under subtropical no-till conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution from these 3 factors on C dynamics is particularly dependent on residue location in soil (Coppens et al, 2006a, b;Tahir et al, 2016). For example, Coppens et al (2006a) found that, after 9 weeks of experiment, new organic C storage in soil was increased when rapeseed residues were deposited onto the soil surface compared to residues incorporated in the 0-10 cm layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution from these 3 factors on C dynamics is particularly dependent on residue location in soil (Coppens et al, 2006a, b;Tahir et al, 2016). For example, Coppens et al (2006a) found that, after 9 weeks of experiment, new organic C storage in soil was increased when rapeseed residues were deposited onto the soil surface compared to residues incorporated in the 0-10 cm layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the 13 C entering the soil during plant growth via rhizodeposition can stimulate microbial growth, which is important for soil organic matter formation (Austin et al, 2017). Additionally, rhizodeposits have been reported to be preferentially stabilized in aggregates on organo-mineral interactions due to their closer physical proximity than residue-derived C. Therefore, estimation of 13 C in the soil prior to a decomposition experiment is necessary for partitioning C derived from rhizodeposits from root-derived C, particularly under NT conditions (Tahir et al, 2016).…”
Section: Recovery and Distribution Of 13 C In The Plant Parts And Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a literature survey, we found that most of the labeled residues that were used for C dynamic studies were labeled under controlled conditions (Aita et al, 1997;Sanaullah et al, 2011). This finding may call into question the actual estimates of C contributions to SOM, especially from root residues, because of possible bias introduced into root decomposition due to removing, washing, and drying these roots, which not only results in the loss of fine roots and soluble C, but also destroys root-rhizosphere interaction (Aulen et al, 2012;Tahir et al, 2016). Although it is a complicated task to label plants under field conditions (Comeau et al, 2013), it is necessary particularly where NT is practiced, to replicate actual field conditions of root (i.e., intact roots) and shoot decomposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher substrate use efficiency (i.e. greater accumulation of microbial metabolites per unit of C uptake) is explained by the fact that microbial growth is co-limited by nutrients in a specific and relatively constant stoichiometric C:N:P:sulphur (S) ratio (Cleveland and Liptzin 2007;Kirkby et al 2011;Tahir et al 2016). In their study, Kirkby et al (2014) found up to three-fold greater conversion of straw C into fine-fraction SOC upon nutrient addition, which is well in line with the results of our study (2.9-fold greater retention).…”
Section: Retention Of Straw and Root Cmentioning
confidence: 99%