1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-7722(98)00120-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ resin impregnation for investigating radionuclide retardation in fractured repository host rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MMA is a monomer with low viscosity, 0.00584 Pa s (20 8C), compared to the viscosity of water, 0.00895 Pa s (25 8C). By comparison, the viscosity of CP-acrylic resin used in the previous impregnation tests in GTS was 0.01 Pa s (20 8C) (Frieg et al, 1998). Because the contact angle of MMA on the silicate surfaces is low, the impregnation of bulk rock specimens is rapid due to capillary forces and depends on existing pore apertures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MMA is a monomer with low viscosity, 0.00584 Pa s (20 8C), compared to the viscosity of water, 0.00895 Pa s (25 8C). By comparison, the viscosity of CP-acrylic resin used in the previous impregnation tests in GTS was 0.01 Pa s (20 8C) (Frieg et al, 1998). Because the contact angle of MMA on the silicate surfaces is low, the impregnation of bulk rock specimens is rapid due to capillary forces and depends on existing pore apertures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two projects, EP (Excavation Project) and CP (Connected Porosity project), were implemented to examine geosphere retardation and include studies on matrix diffusion and pore space characterisation (Frieg et al, 1998;Ota et al, 2001;Mö ri et al, 2003). The in situ acrylic resin impregnations succeeded well and it was decided to continue the work using an alternative resin technique applying 14 C-labelled MMA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other case, the fracture environment is composed of a mineral coating followed by a porosity gradient from the fracture to the unaltered matrix (Bonorino et al 1959). Lastly, many fracture environments also exhibit a more complex structure, such as cataclastite or gouge fault (Frieg et al 1998;Prêt et al 2004). Consequently, it is obvious that the porous networks related to fracture wall environment are more complex than the virtual porosity maps used to compute RTDs.…”
Section: Natural Spatial Heterogenitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microstructural analysis of oriented thin sections prepared from core samples revealed two types of heterogeneities: (1) Products of capillary transport of natural radionuclides in poorly permeable (~5 × 10 -4 mD) granite were detected on the walls of the research tunnel, where finely dispersed aggregates of grimselite [K 3 NaU 2 (CO 3 ) 3 · H 2 O] were identified four years after drivage. In the tunnel, grimselite crusts develop in open fissures, where conditions of local extension (decompression) and discharge of slowly migrating water flow are created (K H = 10 -10 -10 -12 m/s, after Frieg et al (1998)). It is noteworthy that such areas are located at a distance of 50-100 m from the tunnel.…”
Section: Natural Analogues and Underground Laboratories In Granite: Amentioning
confidence: 99%