2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-021-01829-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ quality inspection with layer-wise visual images based on deep transfer learning during selective laser melting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, precisely delineating the boundary between the general and task-specific features is challenging. Various research endeavors substantiated the viability and applicability of TL across diverse domains, including medical (Albayrak, 2022; Wang et al , 2021; Yadlapalli et al , 2022), plant science (Joshi et al , 2021), mechanic (Mao et al , 2020) and additive manufacturing (Li et al , 2021). Nagorny et al (2020) used polarimetric images to train VGG16 and MobileNetV2 networks via TL approach for quality inspection of injection parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, precisely delineating the boundary between the general and task-specific features is challenging. Various research endeavors substantiated the viability and applicability of TL across diverse domains, including medical (Albayrak, 2022; Wang et al , 2021; Yadlapalli et al , 2022), plant science (Joshi et al , 2021), mechanic (Mao et al , 2020) and additive manufacturing (Li et al , 2021). Nagorny et al (2020) used polarimetric images to train VGG16 and MobileNetV2 networks via TL approach for quality inspection of injection parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the DL algorithms(J. Li et al, 2021;X. Li et al, 2020) have shown the great capability to extract useful information for AM part quality analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-situ process monitoring of the melt-pool, laser track, or build layer during the AM process is critical in detecting potential porosity and controlling part quality. Commonly measured signatures are thermal (Bakish, 1983;Nath & Mahadevan, 2021) or acoustic features (Eschner et al, 2020), and optical images (Bugatti & Colosimo, 2021;Li et al, 2021;McCann et al, 2021) before or after powder recoating or powder fusion (Grasso & Colosimo, 2017). However, In-situ process monitoring, and porosity detection in current literature (Paulson et al, 2020;Scime et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2020) can only detect porosity that has already occurred but cannot predict potential porosity which might occur in the future, a much-desired ability to guide real-time process parameter optimization for better part quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%