2016
DOI: 10.15598/aeee.v14i3.1707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Parameter Estimation of Synchronous Machines Using Genetic Algorithm Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 8 shows the initial residual representing the difference between the operational inductance frequency response giving by (26) and the experimental one. The error in the phase varies between −0.2513 and 1.589 degrees, while the error in the magnitude is within the range of 0-0.7165 dB.…”
Section: • Step 4: Fourth Pole-zero Pairmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 8 shows the initial residual representing the difference between the operational inductance frequency response giving by (26) and the experimental one. The error in the phase varies between −0.2513 and 1.589 degrees, while the error in the magnitude is within the range of 0-0.7165 dB.…”
Section: • Step 4: Fourth Pole-zero Pairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major drawback of this method is that the result can converge to a local minimum depending on the initial values used and the choice of model. Other more robust alternatives are presented in some publications, such as the Maximum Likelihood Method [24], genetic algorithms [25,26], and particle swarm optimization [27], or stochastic fractal search algorithm [28]. However, their implementation is more complex and requires more computing power than the methods suggested in the IEEE 115 standard [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%