2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Optical Reflectance Difference Observations of CO Oxidation over Pd(100)

Abstract: Using a home-built reflectometer, we have investigated the changes in the optical reflectivity of a Pd(100) model catalyst during CO oxidation under high-pressure, high-temperature conditions. We observe changes in optical contrast when exposing the surface to CO oxidation conditions at 200 mbar from room temperature up to 400 °C. These changes in reflectivity are a result both of the formation of a surface oxide layer and of a change in surface roughness because of gas exposure. However, the reflectivity is m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They further stipulate that even very thin oxides with a thickness of only a few nanometers can be detected using this method. 15 Since it works with visible light, 2D-SOR can be used under high-pressure conditions and when the sample is submerged in an electrolyte. We have since developed this method further and have also used it in combination with high-energy surface X-ray diffraction (HESXRD) where we correlate changes in the surface reflectance to changes in the surface oxide thickness and roughness on a single-crystal Pd(100) sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They further stipulate that even very thin oxides with a thickness of only a few nanometers can be detected using this method. 15 Since it works with visible light, 2D-SOR can be used under high-pressure conditions and when the sample is submerged in an electrolyte. We have since developed this method further and have also used it in combination with high-energy surface X-ray diffraction (HESXRD) where we correlate changes in the surface reflectance to changes in the surface oxide thickness and roughness on a single-crystal Pd(100) sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon can be explained by the CO adsorption/oxidation on the Pt electrode and the oxidation of the Pt surface. 8 At the beginning of the potential sweep, a part of formic acid is dissociated to form adsorbed CO (CO ad ) on the Pt surface. In this case, the CO to Pt forward donation of electron greatly outweighs the backdonation, the net charge of the Pt is negative, which leads to a high free electron density of metal, large reflectance of the probe light and low photothermal intensity (Figure 2b, 0.5 V).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 However, the imaging speed of traditional scanning electrochemical microscopy ranges from a few minutes to a few hours per frame, due to the move-stop-measure scan mode and a trade-off between probe response time and current detection sensitivity. 4 In situ spectroscopic methods such as electro-reectance, [5][6][7][8][9] infrared spectroscopy, 10,11 Raman spectroscopy, 12 sum-frequency generation spectroscopy, 13,14 second harmonic generation, 15 and their surface-enhanced derivatives need relative long signal integration time for each measured spot. To real-time monitor the complete electrochemical processes, including the intermediate species, on the whole surface, an electrochemical imaging approach with a temporal resolution compatible with the process on the electrode surface is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, layers of PdO could still be present on the TiO 2 , shielding the TiO 2 from light absorption. The formation of such sites could increase the photocatalyst reflectivity leading to visible light scattering [61]. As well, this phenomenon could also be attributed to the partial blocking of semiconductor pores, which may decrease the TiO 2 specific surface area, as reported in Table 1.…”
Section: Precursor Near Uv-light Photoreductionmentioning
confidence: 92%