2002
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-002-0103-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ observation of the precipitation of manganese sulfide in low-carbon magnesium-killed steel

Abstract: The in-situ observation of MnS precipitation was made on cooling using a confocal laser microscope. It was found that two types of precipitates appeared at the different temperatures. The first type precipitated at the nucleation sites of MgO or MnO-TiOx inclusions in ␥ -Fe in the temperature range between 1500 and 1200 K. The shape was triangular or rodlike, and the size was between 1 and 5 m. The second type of MnS drastically precipitated in ␣ -Fe at 1100 K just after the Ar 3 transformation. The shape was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the combination of the result obtained from the present study and in the literature, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][14][15][16][17][18][19][31][32][33]39,40) we can summarize the formation sequence of oxide and sulfide (including manganese and copper containing system) during cooling processes in view point of cooling rate and steel chemistry as shown in Fig. 14 and Table 3.…”
Section: Sequential Formation Diagram For Each Component Of Precipitatesmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the combination of the result obtained from the present study and in the literature, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][14][15][16][17][18][19][31][32][33]39,40) we can summarize the formation sequence of oxide and sulfide (including manganese and copper containing system) during cooling processes in view point of cooling rate and steel chemistry as shown in Fig. 14 and Table 3.…”
Section: Sequential Formation Diagram For Each Component Of Precipitatesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Recently, Furuhara 31) confirmed this semi-coherent relationship between MnS and g-Fe phase in austenite stainless steel by High Resolution TEM observation. Kimura 32) and Yamamoto 33) observed the precipitation and growth of plate-like MnS in g-Fe over a certain temperature range by the Confocal Scanning Laser Microscope. The crystal structure and lattice parameters 34) of MnS, Cu 2Ϫx S and g-Fe are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Formation Mechanism Of Plate-like Copper Sulfide (Ps) and Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Mn and S product is higher than the equilibrium solubility product for all the nodes at the transformation temperature, the sulfide precipitation is usually observed only in the last zone during the = transformation even for slow cooling rate case. 8,9) By considering only the MnS precipitation in the last = transformation node, S that precipitated as MnS is 0.00048% at 1688 K and 0.00053% at 1616 K for low and high P steels, respectively. Although the amount of precipitation is similar, the precipitation temperature in the high P steel is much lower than that in the low P steel.…”
Section: {12;14;16þmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the experiment data 8) for the 0.04%C-0.21%Mn-0.012%S steel, the starting temperature for MnS precipitation from -Fe is about 1500 K. Therefore, a could be determined to be about 170. Then we could estimate the relationship between S precipitated as MnS or Cu 2 S and the cooling rate as shown in Fig.…”
Section: =4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8) The Confocal Scanning Laser Microscope (CLSM) has recently provided a convenient possibility of making an "insitu" observation of the phase transformation on the surface of samples at high temperatures. Since the 1990's, Yin,9,10) Kimura, 11) Phelan, 12,13) Liu, 14) Chen, 15) and other researchers [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] have applied the CLSM to make in situ observations of the phase transformation of steels or alloys at special heating or cooling rates. For example, Yin 10) found that the incoherent δ/γ interphase boundaries (abbreviated as IBs hereafter) were always unstable with finger-like morphology during δ→γ transformation, which developed along δ/δ grain boundaries (abbreviated as GBs hereafter) at low supercoolings and even into the δ-ferrite matrix at higher supercoolings for the transformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%