2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ observation of needle domain evolution in barium titanate single crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
9
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account their size, orientation and morphology, the b -domains appear different from the domain walls previously observed by optical microscopy in BTO single-crystal 23 . From their Raman signature, the b -domains appear clearly as a combination of both the a -domain and c -domain that could be explained as a bundle of subdomains.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Taking into account their size, orientation and morphology, the b -domains appear different from the domain walls previously observed by optical microscopy in BTO single-crystal 23 . From their Raman signature, the b -domains appear clearly as a combination of both the a -domain and c -domain that could be explained as a bundle of subdomains.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…In addition, there is a clear correlation between c -domain regions (out-of-plane polarizations) and the protrusion evidenced by AFM, as well as between a -domain areas (in-plane polarization) with the trough determined by AFM. Generally, the plane of a–c -domain walls is {110} pc at 45° to the top surface 22 23 . This phenomenon results from twinning structurally induced by the ferroelastic–ferroelectric phase transition occurring at 120 °C in BTO (high temperature Pm3m cubic→tetragonal P4mm ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[3][4][5] So far, tremendous works have been done and significant progress has been achieved in understanding the domain switching process in ferroelectric single crystals, ceramics, and thin films. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Previous investigations demonstrate that domain switching was usually accomplished by inhomogeneous domain nucleation followed by forward and sidewise domain wall motions. 6 In addition, the magnitude and frequency of the applied electric field, 5,7 the boundary condition of the testing specimen, 3 etc., can also significantly affect the domain switching process in ferroelectrics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%