2002
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.42.1546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ Observation of Dislocation Motion and Its Mobility in Fe-Mo and Fe-W Solid Solutions at High Temperatures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[22], a mean dislocation velocity of 2 × 10 −15 m/s is obtained. This value is much lower than the dislocation velocity of 2.3 × 10 −3 m/s evaluated by in-situ TEM observations in a Fe-Mo alloy (0.001C-1.2Mo-0.02N-0.4Si, wt.%) at 738 • C, under a stress actiong on dislocations of 5.3 MPa [23]. This is probably mainly due to different testing temperatures and different levels of stress.…”
Section: Dislocation Densitymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…[22], a mean dislocation velocity of 2 × 10 −15 m/s is obtained. This value is much lower than the dislocation velocity of 2.3 × 10 −3 m/s evaluated by in-situ TEM observations in a Fe-Mo alloy (0.001C-1.2Mo-0.02N-0.4Si, wt.%) at 738 • C, under a stress actiong on dislocations of 5.3 MPa [23]. This is probably mainly due to different testing temperatures and different levels of stress.…”
Section: Dislocation Densitymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The regression using Equation gives a good fit to the experimental measurements, and the resulting value of 54 844 K for k 3 corresponds to an activation energy of 456 000 J mol −1 . This is substantially larger than the value of 224 200 J mol −1 adopted from Terada et al for Mo diffusion. A more detailed evaluation of k 2 and k 3 is, however, difficult due the complexity of the parent system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Calculations using the LSW theory require values for the diffusion coefficient, surface energy, solubility, molar volume, and volume fraction coefficient . The computed results show considerably slower growth than experimentally measured, even with a volume fraction coefficient k ( f V ) = 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In case of 316 LN steel, Praveen et al [24] reported the dislocation glide velocity to be in the range of ~5 ×10 -9 -5 ×10 -8 m/s for 120-225 MPa at 650 o C. Bonora et al [26] reported the average dislocation velocity to be in the range of ~2 ×10 -12 -3.25 ×10 -8 m/s. In case of Fe-0.7W alloys, Terada et al [27] reported the dislocation velocity to be ~3.25 ×10 -8 m/s for 720 o C / 3.8 MPa. In case of Fe-0.7Mo alloys, Terada et al [27] reported the dislocation velocity to be ~ 2.3 ×10 -8 m/s for 738 o C / 5.3 MPa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%