2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ neutron diffraction during biaxial deformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electron backscattering diffraction reveals a mild texture, the details of which are presented in Ref. 5. The grains are equiaxed with $7 microns average size.…”
Section: Materials Properties and Samplementioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Electron backscattering diffraction reveals a mild texture, the details of which are presented in Ref. 5. The grains are equiaxed with $7 microns average size.…”
Section: Materials Properties and Samplementioning
confidence: 90%
“…13 Cruciform samples of 316L austenitic stainless steel were deformed under uniaxial and biaxial monotonic tensile loading and strain path changes. 5 The results showed that lattice strain evolution under monotonic equibiaxial tension (EQUI) is significantly different from uniaxial tension in a dog-bone (DB) sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This includes bulge pressure tests [14,15], flat punch [16,17], hemi-spherical punch [18], multiaxial compression tests [19] and cruciform tests [20][21][22][23][24][25][26], each with their own specific strengths and weaknesses. For low and moderate levels of plastic deformation the cruciform tests are the most versatile option since they allows applying in-plane biaxial stresses with arbitrary ratios of the stresses along the principal directions and to perform strain path changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%