2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10450-011-9329-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ measurement of gas adsorption processes using Flux Response Technology

Abstract: Flux Response Technology (FRT) is being developed as a powerful in situ perturbation technique to facilitate detailed characterisation of heterogeneous catalysts. FRT works by measuring minuscule changes in flowrate between two gas streams for potentially any gaseous process involving a change in volume (dV /dt). FRT functions analogous to an electrical Wheatstone bridge assembly whereby gas molecules represent electrons and flow capillaries represent resistors. A perturbation of pressure, temperature, but par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, the versatility of the FRT method in measuring adsorption, reaction and desorption in situ in the reactor has been reported (Buffham et al, 2000;Palmer et al, 2011;Richardson et al, 2004). By applying the Zero Length Column (ZLC) method to analyse the desorption curves generated by the FRT system, the correct representation of the rate of diffusion within the washcoat is calculated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous studies, the versatility of the FRT method in measuring adsorption, reaction and desorption in situ in the reactor has been reported (Buffham et al, 2000;Palmer et al, 2011;Richardson et al, 2004). By applying the Zero Length Column (ZLC) method to analyse the desorption curves generated by the FRT system, the correct representation of the rate of diffusion within the washcoat is calculated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The FRT method functions in a way that is analogous to an electrical Wheatstone bridge assembly whereby gas molecules represent electrons and flow capillaries represent resistors (Palmer et al, 2011). The technique is based on capillary viscometry and can be used to measure minuscule changes in flow rates between two gas streams for potentially any gaseous process involving a change in volume (dV/dt) (Buffham et al, 1986 and2002;Russell et al, 1986;Mason et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this paper is to measure propane diffusivity in the washcoat of monolith samples using Flux Response Technology (FRT) and to show that this method can be used to compare and contrast with other micro and macroporous techniques in one experiment by analysing the adsorption and desorption transients in the FRT profile. In previous studies (Buffham et al 2000;Richardson et al 2004;Palmer et al 2011), we have shown the versatility of the FRT method in measuring adsorption, reaction and desorption in situ in the reactor. By applying the Zero Length Column (ZLC) method to analyse the sorption curves generated by the FRT system, the rate of diffusion in the washcoat is calculated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The technique is based on capillary viscometry and can be used to measure minuscule changes in flowrate between two gas streams for potentially any gaseous process involving a change in molar hold-up (δN/δt) (Buffham et al 1986a(Buffham et al , 1986bMason 1998;Russell et al 2002Russell et al , 2003Palmer et al 2011). FRT functions analogous to an electrical Wheatstone bridge assembly whereby gas molecules represent electrons and flow capillaries represent resistors.…”
Section: Fundamentals Of Frtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The zeolites in question have been well characterised making use of both, XRD and solid state NMR to validate the non-existence of extra-framework Al which would compromise the accuracy of the FRT measurements (Palmer et al 2011). The textural characterisation of the zeolite samples was carried out using a Micromeritics Tristar 3000 Surface Analyser with the data shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%