Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-012-1312-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Laser Synthesis of Fe-Based Amorphous Matrix Composite Coating on Structural Steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to previous studies on laser processing of crystalline and non-crystalline materials, higher laser energies result in a higher local cooling rate due to a greater temperature difference between the melt pool and surrounding material [27,29]. This higher cooling rate should favor the retention of the amorphous nature of the Al 86 Ni 6 Y 4.5 Co 2 La 1.5 MG.…”
Section: Devitrificationmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to previous studies on laser processing of crystalline and non-crystalline materials, higher laser energies result in a higher local cooling rate due to a greater temperature difference between the melt pool and surrounding material [27,29]. This higher cooling rate should favor the retention of the amorphous nature of the Al 86 Ni 6 Y 4.5 Co 2 La 1.5 MG.…”
Section: Devitrificationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…If the value of PE is much large than 1, the convection plays a dominant role in heat transfer within the melt pool. Since the coefficient of the surface tension is negative in metals [25] and the Gaussian distribution of the laser energy (TEM 00 , M 2 < 1.05) results in the center of the melt pool having a higher temperature [27], the liquid flows from the center of the melt pool to the edge.…”
Section: Melt Pool Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…c (100 C min À1 ) is the heating rate employed, r s (10 mm) is the radius of the sample and k S (40 Wm À1 K À1 ) and k D (129 Wm À1 K À1 ) are the thermal conductivities of the fully dense amorphous alloy [41] and graphite, [30] respectively. c (100 C min À1 ) is the heating rate employed, r s (10 mm) is the radius of the sample and k S (40 Wm À1 K À1 ) and k D (129 Wm À1 K À1 ) are the thermal conductivities of the fully dense amorphous alloy [41] and graphite, [30] respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[84,85] This is because that although the overall heating and cooling rates during metal additive manufacturing is reported to be very high at the order of 10 3 -10 8 K s À1 , [86] the local heating and cooling rate may vary. [87] The second reason is the strong directional global heat flux in the metal additive manufacturing process. The first reason is the intrinsic energy distribution of energy source, for example, the Gaussian-like distribution of the laser beam.…”
Section: Additive Manufacturing and Requirements For Producing Bulk Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first reason is the intrinsic energy distribution of energy source, for example, the Gaussian-like distribution of the laser beam. [87] The second reason is the strong directional global heat flux in the metal additive manufacturing process. [88] Therefore, some regions of the materials will probably undergo a relatively low cooling rate compared to other regions.…”
Section: Additive Manufacturing and Requirements For Producing Bulk Mmentioning
confidence: 99%