2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ growth of hollow NiCo layered double hydroxide on carbon substrate for flexible supercapacitor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the area of the CV curve gradually increased with increasing scan rate, the curve shapes remained almost unchanged. The stable voltage window of the LNF‐0.1//LNF‐0.1 flexible device was 2 V, which was much higher than those flexible supercapacitors reported as follows: 1.7 V for VO 2 @PCNFs// PCNFs (Na 2 SO 4 ), [14] 1.8 V for CNO‐ZnO//ZnO (KOH), [15] 1.7 V for MnO 2 //FeSe 2 (LiCl), [16] 1.6 V for CuCo 2 O 4 @Ni(OH) 2 /CF//AC/CFC (KOH), [17] 1.6 V for Zn 0.76 Co 0.24 S/NiCo 2 S 4 //AC ( KOH), [18] and 1.6 V for H‐NiCo LDH@ACC//AC (KOH) [19] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the area of the CV curve gradually increased with increasing scan rate, the curve shapes remained almost unchanged. The stable voltage window of the LNF‐0.1//LNF‐0.1 flexible device was 2 V, which was much higher than those flexible supercapacitors reported as follows: 1.7 V for VO 2 @PCNFs// PCNFs (Na 2 SO 4 ), [14] 1.8 V for CNO‐ZnO//ZnO (KOH), [15] 1.7 V for MnO 2 //FeSe 2 (LiCl), [16] 1.6 V for CuCo 2 O 4 @Ni(OH) 2 /CF//AC/CFC (KOH), [17] 1.6 V for Zn 0.76 Co 0.24 S/NiCo 2 S 4 //AC ( KOH), [18] and 1.6 V for H‐NiCo LDH@ACC//AC (KOH) [19] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stable voltage window of the LNF-0.1//LNF-0.1 flexible device was 2V ,w hich was much higher than those flexible supercapacitors reported as follows:1 .7 Vf or VO 2 @PCNFs// PCNFs (Na 2 SO 4 ), [14] 1.8 Vf or CNO-ZnO//ZnO (KOH), [15] 1.7 Vf or MnO 2 // FeSe 2 (LiCl), [16] 1.6 Vf or CuCo 2 O 4 @Ni(OH) 2 /CF//AC/CFC (KOH), [17] 1.6 Vf or Zn 0.76 Co 0.24 S/NiCo 2 S 4 //AC (K OH), [18] and 1.6 Vf or H-NiCo LDH@ACC//AC (KOH). [19] The electrochemical property of the LNF-0.1//LNF-0.1 flexible devicew as explored by galvanostatic chargea nd discharge tests. As shown in Figure 7b,t he GCD curveso ft his device at different current densities were somewhat similar, indicating a high coulomb efficiency.T he specific capacitances of the LNF-0.1//LNF-0.1 flexible device based on the area of the active electrode were calculated at differentc urrent densities (Figure 7c).…”
Section: Electrochemical Performanceo Fflexible Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the presence of abundant active sites and layered structure, the expected redox reaction incorporated short diffusion lengths of ions and electrons are affiliated with LDH, making it a potential anode for LIBs. However, the poor conductivity and serious aggregation of LDH nanosheets restricts its lithium storage performance (Xuan et al, 2019 ). Based on many cases, one of the effective strategies is to modify LDHs with rational carbon materials coatings enabling the improved conductivity and expected electrochemical properties, such as aerogel, graphene nanosheets, and carbon nanotubes (Gao et al, 2011 ; Yang et al, 2013 ; Song et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…better than most of nickel base electrodes in the literatures, such as NiO NSAs@Co3O4-NiO//AC (0.216 mWh cm −2 at 27.2 mW cm −2 ), 48 RGO (0.95 mWh cm −2 at 2.01 mW cm −2 ) 52 and H-NiCo LDH@ACC//AC (0.07 mWh cm −2 at 0.7 mW cm −2 ). 53 Besides, the mass power density and energy density are also computed ( Figure S6b), which also demonstrating competitive performance in a number of electrodes that have been reported.…”
Section: Electrochemical Behavior Of Nvc-18ov//ac Asymmetric Supermentioning
confidence: 61%
“…7f in the form of a Ragone plot. It can be seen that the energy density of NVC‐1.8Ov//AC ASC decreased from 0.471 to 0.191 mWh cm −2 when the power density increased from 9.319 to 37.303 mW cm −2 , which much better than most of nickel base electrodes in the literatures, such as NiO NSAs@Co3O4‐NiO//AC (0.216 mWh cm −2 at 27.2 mW cm −2 ), 48 NiCo 2 S 4 @Ni‐Mn LDH/GS//VN/GS (0.156 mWh cm −2 at 3.76 mW cm −2 ), 49 CuNi‐hybrid/Cu//AC (0.42 mWh cm −2 at 2.297 mW cm −2 ), 50 Co 3 S 4 @Ni 3 S 4 //PC (0.19 mWh cm −2 at 1.72 mW cm −2 ), 51 Ni(OH) 2 ‐Cu//RGO (0.95 mWh cm −2 at 2.01 mW cm −2 ) 52 and H‐NiCo LDH@ACC//AC (0.07 mWh cm −2 at 0.7 mW cm −2 ) 53 . Besides, the mass power density and energy density are also computed (Figure S6b), which also demonstrating competitive performance in a number of electrodes that have been reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%