2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ GPR test for three-dimensional mapping of the dielectric constant in a rock mass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the fitting hyperbola tool, 94 hyperbolic diffractions were fitted using the software package GRED™ ( Figure 6). It was found that the propagation velocity varied significantly in the surveyed rock mass body of the bench confirming the finding in [30]. The maximum and minimum propagation velocities identified were equal to 136.0 Mm/s (Megameter/s) and 89.0 Mm/s, respectively.…”
Section: Data Processing and Velocity Estimationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Using the fitting hyperbola tool, 94 hyperbolic diffractions were fitted using the software package GRED™ ( Figure 6). It was found that the propagation velocity varied significantly in the surveyed rock mass body of the bench confirming the finding in [30]. The maximum and minimum propagation velocities identified were equal to 136.0 Mm/s (Megameter/s) and 89.0 Mm/s, respectively.…”
Section: Data Processing and Velocity Estimationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Отмечена оперативность получения информации в так называемом режиме in situ посредством анализа отраженных волн от дифрагирующих объектов (M. Elkarmotya, C. Colla, E. Gabrielli, P. Papeschi, S. Bonduà, R. Bruno, M. Loewer, J. Igel, N. Wagner [238,239]), однако в подавляющем большинстве случаев отсутствуют обоснованные геофизические признаки для интерпретации полученных данных. Исследования носят узкоспециализированный или экспериментальный характер и не применимы на других объектах.…”
Section: современные тенденции георадарных исследованийunclassified
“…GPR survey was carried out because it is a non-destructive fast technique and due to its ability to detect the internal discontinuities and anomalies of structures 31 , 32 (Fig. 10 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%