2000
DOI: 10.1078/0065-1281-00535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ fluorescence visualization of bromouridine incorporated into newly transcribed nucleolar RNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We faced, however, a major technical problem in detection of labeled RNA as far as the consecutive pulses of different modified nucleotides were concerned (see below). While biotin-labeled RNA can be detected regardless of the fixation method used, BrU-labeled RNA fails to be detected, without additional treatment, in nucleoli after formaldehyde fixation (Wansink et al 1993;Koberna et al 1999Koberna et al , 2000. Nucleolar BrU-labeled RNA, BrU representing the most convenient marker of newly synthesized RNA in general, requires methanol/acetone fixation for detection (Koberna et al 1999(Koberna et al , 2000.…”
Section: Fibrillarin Domains Are Not Affected During Hypotonic Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We faced, however, a major technical problem in detection of labeled RNA as far as the consecutive pulses of different modified nucleotides were concerned (see below). While biotin-labeled RNA can be detected regardless of the fixation method used, BrU-labeled RNA fails to be detected, without additional treatment, in nucleoli after formaldehyde fixation (Wansink et al 1993;Koberna et al 1999Koberna et al , 2000. Nucleolar BrU-labeled RNA, BrU representing the most convenient marker of newly synthesized RNA in general, requires methanol/acetone fixation for detection (Koberna et al 1999(Koberna et al , 2000.…”
Section: Fibrillarin Domains Are Not Affected During Hypotonic Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While biotin-labeled RNA can be detected regardless of the fixation method used, BrU-labeled RNA fails to be detected, without additional treatment, in nucleoli after formaldehyde fixation (Wansink et al 1993;Koberna et al 1999Koberna et al , 2000. Nucleolar BrU-labeled RNA, BrU representing the most convenient marker of newly synthesized RNA in general, requires methanol/acetone fixation for detection (Koberna et al 1999(Koberna et al , 2000. This latter approach represents fixation by precipitation rather than true chemical fixation, and therefore, using light microscopy resolution, we had to demonstrate that compatible results can be obtained after both formaldehyde and methanol/acetone fixation.…”
Section: Fibrillarin Domains Are Not Affected During Hypotonic Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…) in glycerol buffer [25 % (w/v) glycerol, 5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.5 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM PMSF, 20 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.4)] and exposed to transcription buffer [25 % (w/v) glycerol, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.5 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM each ATP, CTP and GTP, 0.2 mM BrUTP (Sigma), 1 mM PMSF, 5 U RNAsin ml 21 (Promega), 50 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.4)] for 30 min at 37 u C as described previously (Koberna et al, 2000). After incubation, the coverslips were fixed in cold 1 : 1 methanol : acetone mix at 220 u C for 4 min, dried and stained with anti-BrUTP monoclonal antibody (clone BU-33; Sigma) and Hoechst-33342 DNA dye as described previously (Bardina et al, 2009 The control cells displayed a moderate granular staining in the nucleoplasm that corresponded to RNA pol II-and pol III-dependent synthesis, which could not be discriminated by this method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%