“…This is about 30 times higher than that of pure PEDOT (0.1 µW/mK 2 ) prepared by the same procedure, and also much higher than those of a CB/PEDOT nanocomposite (0.96 µWm −1 K −2 with 2.52 wt % CB at 300 K) [16] and a graphite-PEDOT: PSS coated polyester fabric (0.025 µWm −1 K −2 with 15 wt % graphite content at 398 K) [20]. However, this value is lower when compared to the nanocomposites using graphene or carbon nanotube as fillers, for example, a graphene/PEDOT:PSS nanocomposite (11.09 µWm −1 K −2 with 2 wt % graphene at 300 K) [17], a rGO/PEDOT composite (5.2 µWm −1 K −2 with 16 wt% rGO at 300 K) [18], a MWCNT/PEDOT composite (25.9 µWm −1 K −2 with 26.5 wt % MWCNT at 300 K) [19], a PEDOT:PSS/graphene-iron oxide nanocomposite (51.93 µWm −1 K −2 with 95 wt % GINC at 300 K) [28], a graphene/PEDOT:PSS composite (53.3 µWm −1 K −2 with 3 wt % graphene at room temperature) [23], a SWCNT/PEDOT:PSS composite (300 µWm −1 K −2 with 74 wt % SWCNTs at room temperature) [24], and a CNT/PEDOT composite (1050 µWm −1 K −2 with 10.7 wt % CNTs at room temperature) [25]. The possible potential applications of our graphite/PEDOT nanocomposites can be used in the following aspects: wrist watches, remote wireless sensors, biomedical devices, etc.…”