ABSTRACT. Vaccination with a recombinant antigen fused to a targeting molecule is a potential strategy for inducing efficient immune responses. For the therapeutic purpose of allergic diseases in dogs, a DNA construct which expresses recombinant fusion protein with two functional domains, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen (CTLA-4) and Fcε receptor Iα, was developed to bridge antigen-presenting cells and IgE-allergen complex. The recombinant fusion protein expressed by the DNA construct was demonstrated to retain the ability to bind monocytes in PBMC and dog IgE, respectively. Additionally, the recombinant protein induced enhancement of allergen-induced lymphoproliferation in experimentally sensitized dogs under conditions of suboptimal allergen stimulation. These results indicated that the DNA construct could enhance allergen-induced immune responses in vivo, implying its usefulness for perspective application in immunotherapy in dogs. KEY WORDS: allergic disease, canine, co-stimulatory molecule, DNA immunization, immunotherapy.J. Vet. Med. Sci. 66(6): 611-617, 2004 Allergic diseases including atopic dermatitis and allergic bronchitis are caused by type 1 and type 4 hypersensitivities, and are one of the most frequently encountered diseases in veterinary medicine. As in humans, allergic diseases in dogs are caused by various allergens, and increasing numbers of dogs are suffering from dermal or respiratory symptoms derived from the IgE-mediated pathogenesis of disease. Specific immunotherapy has been applied to treat dogs with allergic diseases similar to homologous diseases in human medicine [22].Allergen-specific immunotherapy, the administration of increasingly higher doses of allergen extract, is the only curative approach toward IgE-mediated allergies [17], and can induce the alleviation or resolution of sensitivity to an allergen. Although the complex mechanisms of immunotherapy are not well understood, proposed mechanisms include the induction of "blocking antibodies" [18], a reduction in the number of eosinophils in lesions and the release of proinflammatory mediators [5], the induction of suppressor cells [15], and the altering of the Th1-Th2 cytokine balance toward Th1 dominance [5,10]. In spite of its curative potential, however, the application of immunotherapy to clinical cases of allergy is limited because of major drawbacks with the current protocol, some of which are more problematic in dogs than humans. The long duration necessary for therapy (months to years) and uncertain efficacy, which vary among reports as well as individuals, usually lead to poor compliance by patients (or owners in veterinary cases). Anaphylactic side effects are less problematic in dogs, but were reported to be a reason for cessation of therapy in some cases. It is considered that poor immunogenicity of the allergen, insufficient for the induction of Th1 dominance [5], and allergic responses against causative or other potential allergens included in the extract used for immunotherapy [17], are responsible for these drawb...