1994
DOI: 10.1038/370288a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ evidence for the nature of the seismic layer 2/3 boundary in oceanic crust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
161
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
9
161
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hole 504B remains the only site whether the seismic Layer 2/3 boundary has been penetrated (e.g., Detrick et al, 1994). At that location, the change in seismic gradient clearly occurs within the dikes and the Layer 2/3 transition most probably reflects The upper gabbros are more strongly hydrothermally altered than the immediately overlying sheeted dikes that have been subjected to contact metamorphic recrystallization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hole 504B remains the only site whether the seismic Layer 2/3 boundary has been penetrated (e.g., Detrick et al, 1994). At that location, the change in seismic gradient clearly occurs within the dikes and the Layer 2/3 transition most probably reflects The upper gabbros are more strongly hydrothermally altered than the immediately overlying sheeted dikes that have been subjected to contact metamorphic recrystallization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fundamental question we will address in this experiment is how velocity changes within seismic Layer 2 and the Layer 2-Layer 3 transition relate to physical, lithological, structural, and alteration variations in the volcanic rocks, dikes, and gabbros. At Site 504, in crust generated at an intermediate-rate spreading ridge, the Layer 2-Layer 3 transition lies within the 1 km thick sheeted dike complex and coincides with a metamorphic change (Detrick et al, 1994;Alt et al, 1996a), but it is unknown whether the results from Hole 504B are representative of ocean crust in general or of crust generated at different spreading rates. Is the depth to gabbros shallower in crust generated at a superfast spreading rate as predicted, and what are the relative thicknesses of volcanic and dike sections compared with crust constructed at slow or intermediate spreading rates?…”
Section: Scientific Objectives Of Expeditions 309 and 312mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our preferred explanation for this difference is the presence of a thicker extrusive/dike transition at 35øN than is typical of the EPR. Within the well-resolved depth range of our experiment (1-2.5 km below the seafloor), factors that may be responsible for the velocity variation with depth include a decrease in porosity due to lithostatic pore closure [Spudich and Orcutt, 1980], crack cementation by alteration products [Wilkens et al, 1991], a decrease in the proportion of high-porosity extrusive rocks relative to dikes [Herron, 1982], and an increase in metamorphic grade [e.g., Detrick et al, 1994]. Without additional information, the significance of each of these processes cannot be ascertained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porosities and thermal conductivities decrease with depth in the dikes, and seismic velocity and resistivity gradients flatten out at about 1500 mbsf. Detrick et al (1994) interpreted these changes as marking the transition from seismic Layer 2 to Layer 3 at Site 504. Drilling in Hole 504B was halted in a suspected fault zone at 2111 mbsf, where the drilling rate increased in the presumably pulverized rock, and in which the drill string became stuck, preventing further penetration (Alt, Kinoshita, Stokking, et al, 1993).…”
Section: Site 504mentioning
confidence: 99%