2022
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10512841.1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ estimation of erosion model parameters using an advection-diffusion model and Bayesian inversion

Abstract: We describe a framework for the simultaneous estimation of model parameters in a partial differential equation using sparse observations. Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) sampling is used in a Bayesian framework to estimate posterior probability distributions for each parameter. We describe the necessary components of this approach and its broad potential for application in models of unsteady processes. The framework is applied to three case studies, of increasing complexity, from the field of cohesive sediment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang, Nielsen, Perrochet, and Jia (2021) used spectral analysis (SA) and bandpass filtering to distinguish the HA and LR components. One of the most promising ideas to estimate a group of sediment transport parameters is through the best fitting of measured SSC time series and those predicted by analytical (Lavelle et al., 1984; Zhang et al., 2024), numerical (Amoudry et al., 2014; Edge et al., 2023; Erikson et al., 2013; D. Wang et al., 2018; Yang & Hamrick, 2003), or conceptual models (Hill et al., 2003; Jago & Jones, 1998; Weeks et al., 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang, Nielsen, Perrochet, and Jia (2021) used spectral analysis (SA) and bandpass filtering to distinguish the HA and LR components. One of the most promising ideas to estimate a group of sediment transport parameters is through the best fitting of measured SSC time series and those predicted by analytical (Lavelle et al., 1984; Zhang et al., 2024), numerical (Amoudry et al., 2014; Edge et al., 2023; Erikson et al., 2013; D. Wang et al., 2018; Yang & Hamrick, 2003), or conceptual models (Hill et al., 2003; Jago & Jones, 1998; Weeks et al., 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%