2016
DOI: 10.1002/bit.26197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ enhancement of surfactin biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis using novel artificial inducible promoters

Abstract: Surfactin-family lipopeptides are green biosurfactants with substantial industrial potential. The major problem prohibiting surfactin use is the low titer of the wild producer, Bacillus subtilis. Using transcriptomic analysis, four strong promoters, PgroE, Pcdd, PrplK, and PsspE, were identified and cloned from the genome of B. subtilis THY-7, a novel surfactin producer that has been identified from soil with a 0.55 g/L surfactin titer. An optimal promoter, PgroE, was selected to replace the native THY-7 surfa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, many studies on replacing the promoter of the srfA operon to abrogate the effect of quorum sensing on the synthesis of surfactin have been reported (Jiao et al, ; Sun et al, ; Willenbacher et al, ). Unfortunately, the results of these attempts were far from satisfactory and did not lead to high surfactin yields, indicating that a complex regulatory network controls srfA expression, so that modifying the srfA operon is not a good choice (Jung et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, many studies on replacing the promoter of the srfA operon to abrogate the effect of quorum sensing on the synthesis of surfactin have been reported (Jiao et al, ; Sun et al, ; Willenbacher et al, ). Unfortunately, the results of these attempts were far from satisfactory and did not lead to high surfactin yields, indicating that a complex regulatory network controls srfA expression, so that modifying the srfA operon is not a good choice (Jung et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, improving its yield and reducing its production cost will be of great significance. Most of the efficient surfactin producers reported to date prefer sucrose as the carbon source (Jiao et al, ; Yan, Wu, & Xu, ). By contrast, glycerol, which is a by‐product of biodiesel production, is a widely available and inexpensive source of carbon, making its conversion into value‐added products of great interest (Clomburg & Gonzalez, ; Faria et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biosynthesis pathway of surfactin was presented in Figure S4, which mainly contains three parts: the synthesis and activation of branched-chain fatty acids; the synthesis of the four amino acids; and the assembly of peptide chain. For surfactin, it can hardly achieve a signi cant breakthrough in production only through traditional fermentation optimization because of its low yield in wild strains [16,35]. Strategies for surfactin overproduction were focused on strain modi cation recent years, such as substitution of the native promoter P srf of srfA operon [15,16], overexpressing transporters to enhance surfactin e ux [18], and modifying the regulators ComX and PhrC [35].…”
Section: Genome Reduction Can Improve the Metabolic Phenotypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the heterologous expression of srfA is challenging for which large genetic sequence (over 25 kb), substitution of the native srfA promoter by strong promoters is considered more bene cial for enhanced transcription of srfA operon [15,16,20]. In this study, two promoters PR suc and PR tpx with better transcription and expression levels were integrated into upstream of the srfA operon in GR167ID, generating mutant strains GR167IDS and GR167IDT, respectively.…”
Section: Substitution Of the Native Srfa Promoter Further Enhanced Sumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this system, the obtained enzyme activity was 88.86 U/mL in shake flasks and 205 U/mL in a 5 L fermenter. In addition, the core elements of promoters, including the −35 and −10 regions (Jiao et al, 2017 ) and ribosome recognition site (Wang and Doi, 1984 ), have been optimized to enhance the promoter strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%