2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10544-020-00514-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ electromechanical testing and loading system for dynamic cell-biomaterial interaction study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure d schematically illustrates the principle of piezoelectric signal production under compressive loading. The piezoelectric output of the NGs under cyclic loading is detected using a homemade machine and a charge amplifier (Figure e) . The open-circuit voltages of PDMS, PDMS@BTO s , PDMS@BTO d , and PDMS@BTO d+s samples (1 × 1.5 cm 2 with 1 μm thickness) under a compressive strain of 10% at 1 Hz are compared, as shown in Figure f, suggesting that a positive peak voltage of 6.2 V is generated on PDMS@BTO d+s , which is 50 and 250% higher than those on PDMS@BTO d and PDMS@BTO s , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure d schematically illustrates the principle of piezoelectric signal production under compressive loading. The piezoelectric output of the NGs under cyclic loading is detected using a homemade machine and a charge amplifier (Figure e) . The open-circuit voltages of PDMS, PDMS@BTO s , PDMS@BTO d , and PDMS@BTO d+s samples (1 × 1.5 cm 2 with 1 μm thickness) under a compressive strain of 10% at 1 Hz are compared, as shown in Figure f, suggesting that a positive peak voltage of 6.2 V is generated on PDMS@BTO d+s , which is 50 and 250% higher than those on PDMS@BTO d and PDMS@BTO s , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The piezoelectric output of the NGs under cyclic loading is detected using a homemade machine and a charge amplifier (Figure 3e). 31 The open-circuit voltages of PDMS, PDMS@BTO s , PDMS@ BTO d , and PDMS@BTO d+s samples (1 × 1.5 cm 2 with 1 μm thickness) under a compressive strain of 10% at 1 Hz are compared, as shown in Figure 3f, suggesting that a positive peak voltage of 6.2 V is generated on PDMS@BTO d+s , which is 50 and 250% higher than those on PDMS@BTO d and PDMS@BTO s , respectively. Meanwhile, a slight voltage on PDMS is detected due to the triboelectric effect between the membrane and the electrode as mentioned in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For measurements, a NFM (20 × 10 × 0.95 mm 3 ) was clamped in the chucks of a home-made testing device with two electrodes connected to the two ends of the NFM, and stretched under controlled frequency and magnitude. 25 The piezoelectric outputs were detected by an electrometer (Keithley 6514 System, Beijing, China). The COMSOL Multiphysics software was used for the theoretical simulation of the piezoelectric outputs, and the elastic constant and piezoelectric and dielectric permittivity coefficients used in the piezoelectric constitutive equation were taken from a previous study.…”
Section: Characterization Of Plla Nfmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a and b, the piezoelectric potentials of NFMs (20 × 10 × 0.95 mm 3 ) were measured using a homemade in situ electromechanical testing and loading system under dynamic stretches with controlled frequency and force. 25 The relationship between the force magnitude and the piezoelectric output was further examined by changing the stretch force from 0.01 to 0.40 N. As the force increased, linear increases in the piezoelectric outputs were detected for PLLA-0 (1.03-1.78 V), PLLA-1.5 (1.21-2.56 V), PLLA-5 (1.55-3.44 V), PLLA-10 (2.15-4.69 V), PLLA-15 (2.66-5.61 V), and PLLA-20 (3.06-6.87 V) NFMs (Fig. 2d).…”
Section: Piezoelectric Output Of Plla Nfmsmentioning
confidence: 99%