1982
DOI: 10.1038/300594a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ electrical resistivity and bulk porosity of the oceanic crust Costa Rica Rift

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
122
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
9
122
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is gives a measure of the bulk properties of the oceanic crust, which most probably varies from 1 S •m1 near the surface to perhaps 0.001 S•m-l at the base of the crust (Becker et al, 1982). The crustal conductivity decreases with depth due to crack closure and sealing.…”
Section: Tectonic Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is gives a measure of the bulk properties of the oceanic crust, which most probably varies from 1 S •m1 near the surface to perhaps 0.001 S•m-l at the base of the crust (Becker et al, 1982). The crustal conductivity decreases with depth due to crack closure and sealing.…”
Section: Tectonic Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bottom 514 m, cored during Leg 83, is characterized by a transition from pillow lavas, pillow breccias, hyaloclastites, and basalt flows to an underlying unit interpreted as a sheeted dike complex similar to that observed in many ophiolites. Geophysical logging and other downhole experiments have found significant physical property changes with depth Becker et al, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirically determined expression relating fluid resistivity to temperature depends on a set of electrolyte-dependent coefficients (Quist & Marshall 1968). If the pore fluid has a salinity close to seawater then the fluid resistivity (ρ f ) depends on temperature as: Becker et al 1982) where T is the temperature in deg C. The relationship is approximately valid up to 300°C. If the predicted temperature profile for the Carnmenellis granite is used in this expression, the result indicates a factor of 10 decrease in the component of bulk resistivity determined by the fluid phase over the upper 10 km of the crustal section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%