“…On the basis of the similarity of the magnetic parameters, the components can be classified into two groups (VO‐1A/B and VO‐2A/B; see also Table 1 ): VO‐1A (≈15%) with magnetic parameters g || = 1.919, A || = 200.9 G and g ⊥ = 1.981, A ⊥ = 75.6 G, calculated g iso = 1.960 and A iso = 117 G; VO‐1B (≈35%) with magnetic parameters g || = 1.907, A || ≅ 201.2 G and g ⊥ ≅ 1.979, A ⊥ = 71.9 G, calculated g iso = 1.955 and A iso = 115 G; VO‐2A (≈25%) with magnetic parameters g || = 1.950, A || ≅ 170.5 G and g ⊥ ≅ 1.971, A ⊥ = 51.0 G, calculated g iso = 1.964 and A iso = 90.8 G; VO‐2B (≈25%) with magnetic parameters g || = 1.938, A | | ≅ 178.3 G and g ⊥ ≅ 1.972, A ⊥ = 57.3 G, calculated g iso = 1.961 and A iso = 97.6 G. Both centers, VO‐1 and VO‐2, represent well‐known monomeric surface vanadyl VO 2+ species in a distorted octahedral (VO‐1) or tetrahedral (VO‐2) environment, as indicated by the values of g iso and A iso , as well as the sharp lines with well‐resolved HFS. [ 27 , 28 ] The parameters listed in Table 1 suggest that the symmetry of the VO‐1 centers is more distorted. [ 27b,c ]…”