2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2009.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ digital microfluidic conductance sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possibility is to use an optical detection, and either rely on additional fluorescence marker or other particles acting as indicators [9,10], or to measure the difference in laser absorption [11]. In the field of electric sensing, first studies reporting droplet sensing [12][13][14] were focused on digital microfluidics [15]. Cahill first reported the electric sensing of a slug flow [16]; he and his forgoers used capacitively coupled measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility is to use an optical detection, and either rely on additional fluorescence marker or other particles acting as indicators [9,10], or to measure the difference in laser absorption [11]. In the field of electric sensing, first studies reporting droplet sensing [12][13][14] were focused on digital microfluidics [15]. Cahill first reported the electric sensing of a slug flow [16]; he and his forgoers used capacitively coupled measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%