2000
DOI: 10.1128/aem.66.2.712-717.2000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Determination of Sulfide Turnover Rates in a Meromictic Alpine Lake

Abstract: A push-pull method, previously used in groundwater analyses, was successfully adapted for measuring sulfide turnover rates in situ at different depths in the meromictic Lake Cadagno. In the layer of phototrophic bacteria at about 12 m in depth net sulfide consumption was observed during the day, indicating active bacterial photosynthesis. During the night the sulfide turnover rates were positive, indicating a net sulfide production from the reduction of more-oxidized sulfur compounds. Because of lack of light,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) suggesting the presence of both sulfideproducing as well as sulfide-consuming populations in the bacterial plume. This is supported by in situ analyses of sulfide turnover rates showing net sulfide consumption during the day and net production during the night during maximal seasonal turbidity (Lehmann et al 1998;Lüthy et al 2000). Net day-time sulfide consumption is attributed to the large activity of phototrophic sulfur bacteria, while nocturnal net sulfide production may be due to increased activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria and anaerobic respiration of internal storage compounds of phototrophic bacteria (Del Don et al 1994;Mas & van Gemerden 1995).…”
Section: Microbial Community Structurementioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1) suggesting the presence of both sulfideproducing as well as sulfide-consuming populations in the bacterial plume. This is supported by in situ analyses of sulfide turnover rates showing net sulfide consumption during the day and net production during the night during maximal seasonal turbidity (Lehmann et al 1998;Lüthy et al 2000). Net day-time sulfide consumption is attributed to the large activity of phototrophic sulfur bacteria, while nocturnal net sulfide production may be due to increased activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria and anaerobic respiration of internal storage compounds of phototrophic bacteria (Del Don et al 1994;Mas & van Gemerden 1995).…”
Section: Microbial Community Structurementioning
confidence: 55%
“…1) (Tonolla et al 1999;Lüthy et al 2000;Camacho et al 2001). Highest bacterial numbers are generally found at depths where sulfide becomes detectable and concentrations increase with depth to up to 3-8 mg l -1 (Fig.…”
Section: Microbial Community Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these aggregates, they are associated with sulfate-reducing bacteria that are also able to grow by disproportionation of inorganic sulfur compounds (26). Aggregates can provide distinct but relatively stable microenvironmental conditions (29) and thus a growth advantage in a habitat with rapid changes of environmental conditions (e.g., intensity of light and sulfide concentrations) (9,15,21). Potential limitation for sulfide in these aggregates could be overcome by the synergistic association with the sulfate-reducing bacteria that presumably resembles a source-sink relationship for sulfide between the sulfate-reducing and the purple sulfur bacteria (26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lake is characterized by a compact chemocline with high concentrations of sulfate; steep gradients of oxygen, sulfide, and light; and a turbidity maximum that correlates to large numbers of bacteria (up to 10 7 cells ml Ϫ1 ) (5,21,31). Molecular methods such as 16S rRNA gene clone library analysis and subsequent in situ hybridization with specific fluorescent probes identified the most abundant bacteria in the chemocline as large-and small-celled purple sulfur bacteria.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Luthy et al (2000) sulphide in the oxic mixolimnion is spontaneously oxidized by oxygen, the rate of oxidation depending on the oxygen concentration. Sulphide oxidation by chemolithotrophic bacteria may occur at the oxicline, and this cannot be distinguished from spontaneous chemical oxidation in the aerated mixolimnion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%