1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4686(99)00310-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ detection and characterization of biofilm in waters by electrochemical methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Modeling studies have predicted that the conductivity of the biofilm would have to be 10 À4 mS cm À1 to avoid electron transfer limitation (Marcus et al, 2007). Although biofilms are generally considered to act as insulators rather than conductors (Herbert-Guillou et al, 1999;Muñ ozBerbel et al, 2006;Dheilly et al, 2008), the finding that cells at substantial distance from the anode are metabolically active is consisent with the concept that anode biofilms may be conductive. Clearly, the more cells that can release electrons from metabolic activity, the greater the potential current output.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling studies have predicted that the conductivity of the biofilm would have to be 10 À4 mS cm À1 to avoid electron transfer limitation (Marcus et al, 2007). Although biofilms are generally considered to act as insulators rather than conductors (Herbert-Guillou et al, 1999;Muñ ozBerbel et al, 2006;Dheilly et al, 2008), the finding that cells at substantial distance from the anode are metabolically active is consisent with the concept that anode biofilms may be conductive. Clearly, the more cells that can release electrons from metabolic activity, the greater the potential current output.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biofilms of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa grown on the two-electrode device described here were not conductive (17), and other microbial biofilms were also found to have poor conductivity (1,2,20). Other current-producing microorganisms such as Shewanella oneidensis (8) and Thermincola strain JR (31) do not form thick biofilms when producing current, suggesting that they are incapable of forming highly conductive biofilms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Most biofilms that have been studied are insulating (1,2,17,20). The possibility of electrically conductive biofilms was first suggested based on the findings that (i) Geobacter sulfurreducens produced thick (40 to 50 m) biofilms when growing on anode surfaces; (ii) biofilm cells not in contact with the anode contributed to current production as much as cells in direct contact; and (iii) the production of thick current-producing biofilms was dependent on the presence of conductive pili (25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling studies have also predicted that high current production by a thick anode associated biofilm is only feasible if the bacterial biofilm is conductive [118,119]. The production of a conductive biofilm is highly unusual as most biofilms act as insulators [120][121][122]. A major breakthrough in the field would be the measurement and determination of the conductivity, and the components responsible of conductivity, of a bacterial biofilm in a MFC.…”
Section: Electrical Interactions Between Microbes and Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%