2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.10.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ detailed fluence rate distributions in a UV reactor with multiple low-pressure lamps: Comparison of experimental and model results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S2). The relatively inhomogeneous FR distribution when the lamps were either close to each other or near the reactor wall was also observed by Li et al [23], as supported by their in-situ measured FR data. The existence of dark zones was another reason for the poor performance of reactors with d r = 0.7, and the relatively more homogeneous FR distribution in reactors with d r = 0.5 generally led to a better performance.…”
Section: Effects Of Lamp Relative Distance and Inlet Id On Reactor Pesupporting
confidence: 67%
“…S2). The relatively inhomogeneous FR distribution when the lamps were either close to each other or near the reactor wall was also observed by Li et al [23], as supported by their in-situ measured FR data. The existence of dark zones was another reason for the poor performance of reactors with d r = 0.7, and the relatively more homogeneous FR distribution in reactors with d r = 0.5 generally led to a better performance.…”
Section: Effects Of Lamp Relative Distance and Inlet Id On Reactor Pesupporting
confidence: 67%
“…It would also be useful to confirm the accuracy of our calculations in the context of work done recently by Li and others (2012, 2013) that supports the assumption made in this paper that adjacent fluorescent tubes in a circular reactor shadow volume elements from the full output of all lamps. 2012Li and others (, 2013) modelled and experimented with a three-lamp scenario and it would be interesting to extend and compare their findings to the lamp described in this paper through a series of measurements under controlled conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A radiation field (PFR distribution) model (UVCalc version 1, Bolton Photosciences Inc., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) was chosen to simulate the PFR distributions at various wavelengths and UV transmittances (UVTs) . Previous research has shown good agreement between UVCalc predictions and experimental measurements in various UV reactors. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%