2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.10.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ control of dewetting of Cu thin films in graphene chemical vapor deposition

Abstract: Abstract.Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) on Cu thin films is a promising approach for the large area formation of graphene on dielectric substrates, but a fine control of the deposition parameters is required to avoid dewetting of the Cu catalyst. In this paper we report on the study of the Cu dewetting phenomena by monitoring the intensity of the infra-red emission from the film surface during Rapid Thermal CVD of graphene. The reduction of Cu film coverage consequent to dewetting is detected as a variation o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(38 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important difference is that we observe suspended graphene on the metal discontinuities in the RTP samples, and not in the ones processed in the quartz tube. The situation is similar to that reported for Cu films [ 20 , 23 ], despite the melting T of Co is about 400 °C higher than Cu.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another important difference is that we observe suspended graphene on the metal discontinuities in the RTP samples, and not in the ones processed in the quartz tube. The situation is similar to that reported for Cu films [ 20 , 23 ], despite the melting T of Co is about 400 °C higher than Cu.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The coverage of the Co film in samples deposited by means of RTP overcomes 95%, whereas it is less than 90% in the case of deposition in the conventional quartz furnace. This suggests that the duration of the heating step plays a role [ 23 ], since in the first case temperature is raised at a rate of 5 °C/s, due to instrumental limitations, and with a rate 10 times lower in the second. Another important difference is that we observe suspended graphene on the metal discontinuities in the RTP samples, and not in the ones processed in the quartz tube.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While weak contact between the catalyst and substrate favors a tip-growth mechanism, a strong interaction promotes base-growth [12][13]. The growth of CNTs can be divided into four steps: (1) supply of carbon source on the catalyst surface by adsorption and the subsequent catalytic decomposition of the adsorbed carbon by carbon atoms; (2) desorption of the carbon atoms into a gas phase; (3) diffusion of the carbon atoms away from the catalyst surface through bulk or surface diffusion; and (4) precipitation and formation of a graphite structure [14][15][16]. Formerly, some synthesis methods of carbon nanotubes, related materials and metal atoms agglomerate are analyzed [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphene was synthesized via rapid cooling CVD, as proposed in Amato et al, [10] using a rapid thermal annealing apparatus. [19] The substrate and catalyst of choice was Co polycrystalline thin film, 500 nm thick, deposited by radio frequency sputtering onto Si substrates with 500-nm thermal SiO 2 . Prior to the graphene deposition, the Co/SiO 2 substrate was cleaned in sonic bath with acetone and ethanol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%