2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.04.515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ bypass and extra-anatomic bypass procedures result in similar survival in patients with secondary aortoenteric fistulas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Graft patency was 95%, and at follow-up, three patients presented with re-infections. Similar results were reported by Weiss et al and Kreibich et al [68,71] . Although the results are promising, longer follow-up data are needed to properly assess this type of reconstruction material.…”
Section: Oral Treatment Ciprofloxacinsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Graft patency was 95%, and at follow-up, three patients presented with re-infections. Similar results were reported by Weiss et al and Kreibich et al [68,71] . Although the results are promising, longer follow-up data are needed to properly assess this type of reconstruction material.…”
Section: Oral Treatment Ciprofloxacinsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Kreibich et al [68] reported a 2% reinfection rate after 11 months. Weiss et al [71] observed no re-infections at four years. In addition to ISR and EAB, graft preservation strategies with irrigation, selective debridement, the use of negative pressure wound therapy, and omental or muscle wrapping have been described with acceptable survival outcomes [52,77,89,95,96] .…”
Section: Aortic Root Ascending Aorta and Aortic Archmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21 Additionally, Janko et al showed similar survival outcomes comparing EAB and ISR in AGI patients with GEF in a retrospective, international, multicentre setting. 22 Importantly, allografts z Extra-anatomic bypass used as index comparator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 , 3 , 5 , 19 , 20 However, a recent retrospective study revealed similar long-term survival and infection-free survival between OISR and EAB in the repair of aortoenteric fistulas. 21 The NAIS and cryopreserved allografts have demonstrated increased resistance to reinfection; however, their use has been associated with longer operative times and a greater physiologic insult. 12 , 18 , 19 Cryopreserved allografts might not be readily available and using either cryopreserved allografts or a NAIS reconstruction could be limited by a size mismatch or an inadequate length to reach the distal target.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%