2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ and ex-situ comparison of the electrochemical oxidation of SO2 on carbon supported Pt and Au catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that the product acid concentration has an important effect on the electrochemical performance of SDE production of sulfuric acid and hydrogen. 8 While Pt kinetics are generally not influenced by the acid concentration, 6 the ohmic overpotential increases due to the loss of hydration in the membrane. 5 However, one important effect of acid accumulation at the catalyst layer is its influence on the thermodynamic potential of the SDE reaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is known that the product acid concentration has an important effect on the electrochemical performance of SDE production of sulfuric acid and hydrogen. 8 While Pt kinetics are generally not influenced by the acid concentration, 6 the ohmic overpotential increases due to the loss of hydration in the membrane. 5 However, one important effect of acid accumulation at the catalyst layer is its influence on the thermodynamic potential of the SDE reaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current work focuses on improvements in the SDE process, as it is one of the major operations that impact the overall HyS cycle efficiency. Literaturereported results to date are far from the performance goals [4][5][6] (600 mV at 500 mA/cm 2 and 65 wt% sulfuric acid) set by technoeconomic analysis to meet the cost target. 7 From the literature, it is apparent that to meet the current, potential, and acid concentration goals simultaneously, operation must take place at high pressures and temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Due to the pressure gradient and water activity difference, water diffuses through the membrane to the anode side and is then re-transported to the cathode side due to electro-osmotic drag [135]. The standard cell potential for the electrochemical step is about −0.158 V at room temperature, which is about 13% of the water electrolysis potential (~−1.229 V) [137,140].…”
Section: Hybrid Sulfur Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[141]. An issue associated with this step is the kinetic overpotential of sulfur dioxide oxidation reaction, which has been addressed by using Pt as the baseline catalytic formulation [142] or Au nanoparticle catalysts with higher current density and stability than the Pt ones [140]. Kim et al [143] prepared Fe/Al and Fe/Ti binary metal oxide catalysts via the co-precipitation method and reported that increasing Fe content improved the catalytic activity.…”
Section: Hybrid Sulfur Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meekins et al 24 investigated the performance of thin films of commercial carbon-supported platinum and gold catalysts for SDE in ex situ (rotating disk electrode RDE) and in situ (single fuel cell) systems. It was demonstrated that Au can be used as a substitute catalyst for Pt for SO 2 electrooxidation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%