2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.05.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ 3D quantification of the evolution of creep cavity size, shape, and spatial orientation using synchrotron X-ray tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the damage development in particulate composites could be analyzed [11,13,14]. Creep has also been studied with such techniques [15][16][17][18]. One additional feature is to quantify kinematic fields via digital volume correlation (or DVC [19,20]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the damage development in particulate composites could be analyzed [11,13,14]. Creep has also been studied with such techniques [15][16][17][18]. One additional feature is to quantify kinematic fields via digital volume correlation (or DVC [19,20]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional metallographic observations suggested that their shape ranges from almost spherical to a crack-like morphology for comparatively large cavities depending on the loading conditions. 352 Four types of cavity were identified by CT. 353 In the initial state, ellipsoidal cavities were dominant, but as creep progressed, while the total volume of all four types of cavities increased, the volume of spheres and rods grew far less rapidly than did ellipsoidal and complex shaped cavities. The predominance of ellipsoids and their total volume during primary and early stage of tertiary creep (a true secondary creep regime was not observed) suggests that surface diffusion around the cavity is rapid enough to maintain the shape of the growing cavity 354 at this stage.…”
Section: Void/damage Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…To enhance cavity nucleation, the samples were first predeformed in tension at room temperature until a strain of 4.5 pct, after which they were mounted in a miniaturized creep machine specially developed for in-situ investigations. [27,28] The tensile stress at the beginning of the experiment was 25 MPa and was supplied by a string. The sample was asymmetrically heated at its lower part using an electric heating coil, which resulted in a constant temperature gradient (about 36.7 K mm À1 ) in the region of the sample with constant cross-sectional area.…”
Section: A Materials and Creep Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimentally, this can be achieved using nondestructive techniques allowing the identification and characterization of the evolution of single cavities. The investigation method partly satisfying these criteria is X-ray microtomography developed at synchrotron sources, [26] which has several advantages over the conventional techniques: (1) provides the 3-D morphology of cavities at progressive stages of creep, (2) makes visible the connectivity between cavities (voids may appear separated on 2-D sections), (3) clearly visualizes the inhomogeneity of damage distribution, [27][28][29][30][31][32] and (4) is free of specimen preparation artifacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%