2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In silico model of drug permeability across sublingual mucosa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Moreover, these results are in good agreement with values found in the literature for sublingual caffeine permeability (Papp = (1 520 ± 310)×10 -8 cm/s; Goswami et al, 2013). Fig.…”
Section: Permeation Experimentssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…1). Moreover, these results are in good agreement with values found in the literature for sublingual caffeine permeability (Papp = (1 520 ± 310)×10 -8 cm/s; Goswami et al, 2013). Fig.…”
Section: Permeation Experimentssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The physicochemical properties generally preferred for common routes of delivery have been reviewed (Mathias and Hussain 2010) and key parameters are summarized in Table 2.9. Further details may be found in recent reviews for transdermal (Neely et al 2009;Paudel et al 2010;Watkinson 2013), intranasal (Chapman et al 2013), and sublingual/buccal delivery Goswami et al 2013;Lam et al 2013). Strict limitations around human efficacy dose (Table 2.10) for nonoral routes of administration are due primarily to permeation limitations or dose volume constraints at these sites.…”
Section: Formulation Considerations For Alternate Drug Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is increasing interest in the early feasibility assessment of IO delivery of drug molecules based on their physicochemical properties [13]. Clearly, a simplified first-order absorption model of the oral cavity is not adequate to integrate the complexity of IO physiology, physicochemical properties, formulation effects, and dosing scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%